2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-015-2294-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Local Observables in Integrable Quantum Field Theories

Abstract: Integrable quantum field theories in 1+1 dimensions have recently become amenable to a rigorous construction, but many questions about the structure of their local observables remain open. Our goal is to characterize these local observables in terms of their expansion coefficients in a series expansion by interacting annihilators and creators, similar to form factors. We establish a rigorous one-to-one characterization, where locality of an observable is reflected in analyticity properties of its expansion coe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…when h L is supported spacelike to the left and h R to the right of g. Since φ changes the particle number only by one, and hence preserves particle-number cutoffs, the commutators in (19) are well-defined in matrix elements for suitable h L , h R . That the commutators do actually vanish is then quite direct to verify; it is a consequence of the form factor equations, see [11,Secs. 4.3 and 5.3].…”
Section: Localitymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…when h L is supported spacelike to the left and h R to the right of g. Since φ changes the particle number only by one, and hence preserves particle-number cutoffs, the commutators in (19) are well-defined in matrix elements for suitable h L , h R . That the commutators do actually vanish is then quite direct to verify; it is a consequence of the form factor equations, see [11,Secs. 4.3 and 5.3].…”
Section: Localitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This approach solves all mathematical convergence problems, but it has a quite different shortcoming: the explicit form of the local operators A ∈ A(O) remains unclear. Their matrix elements z † (θ 1 ) · · · z † (θ k )Ω, AΩ do fulfill the form factor equations [11]; but in the end, these operators are "constructed" using the axiom of choice, and no further information about their relation to pointlike fields or other generators is available.…”
Section: Algebraic Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) is monotonically increasing for s → 0, it follows that the uniform bound (4.15) holds also forK −λ =K (0) −λ , with 0 ≤ λ ≤ π. This finishes the proof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One then constructs an "S-symmetric" Fock space H over H 1 , on which "interacting" annihilation and creation operators z(θ) and z † (θ) act; instead of the CCR, they fulfil the Zamolodchikov-Faddeev relations [Lec08], depending on S. The quantum field theory is constructed on this Fock space. If A is an operator of the theory (of a certain regularity class, including smeared Wightman fields), localized in a bounded spacetime region, then it can be written in a series expansion [BC13,BC15] …”
Section: Integrable Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first set of conditions follows from the general properties of the expansion coefficients F k [A] of a local operator A in integrable models, as derived in [BC15].…”
Section: Proof Given Two Minimal Solutions Fmentioning
confidence: 99%