2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10231-019-00874-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of manifolds of constant curvature by spherical curves

Abstract: It is known that the so-called rotation minimizing (RM) frames allow for a simple and elegant characterization of geodesic spherical curves in Euclidean, hyperbolic, and spherical spaces through a certain linear equation involving the coefficients that dictate the RM frame motion [L.C.B. da Silva and J.D. da Silva, Mediterr. J. Math. 15, 70 (2018)]. Here, we shall prove the converse, i.e., we show that if all geodesic spherical curves on a Riemannian manifold are characterized by a certain linear equation, the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we characterized space forms as the only manifolds with the properties that there exist an extrinsically flat surface tangent to any 2-plane and that these surfaces are all ruled. This result is part of our ongoing effort to find characteristic properties of space forms [21]. As an application of our results, we proved that there must exist extrinsically flat surfaces in the product manifolds H 2 × R and S 2 × R that do not make a constant angle with the real direction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further, we characterized space forms as the only manifolds with the properties that there exist an extrinsically flat surface tangent to any 2-plane and that these surfaces are all ruled. This result is part of our ongoing effort to find characteristic properties of space forms [21]. As an application of our results, we proved that there must exist extrinsically flat surfaces in the product manifolds H 2 × R and S 2 × R that do not make a constant angle with the real direction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Finally, comparison with Eq. (21) shows that ψ(u, w) = λ u (β(v − w)), from which we conclude that Σ 2 is a helicoid.…”
Section: Ruled Minimal Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1.1 and the first part of Theorem 1.2 have been generalized to three-dimensional orientable Riemannian manifolds of constant curvature [ 8 ]; see also [ 2 , 15 ] for related results. In the present note we shall see that, under suitable assumptions, both theorems remain valid when is replaced by an arbitrary Riemannian manifold , provided one restricts the attention to three-dimensional curves; roughly speaking, a curve in M is three-dimensional if it has one curvature and one “torsion”, all other curvature functions being zero.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%