2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of North–Western Mediterranean coralligenous assemblages by video surveys and evaluation of their structural complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coralligenous accretions sampled at the Actea volcano summit cone were firstly analyzed to evaluate the main taxa characterizing the bioconstruction. Taking into account the typical layers of organisms usually growing on healthy coralligenous bioconstructions (Valisano et al, 2019) we found mainly encrusting organisms and a general composition that resembles that reported for coralligenous growing on granitic lithology (Canessa et al, 2020) even if bryozoans in the present coralligenous accretions show a higher diversity. The coralligenous structure was compact and only one species of boring organism was found, the sponge Spiroxya heteroclita Topsent, 1896, highlighting a regular stratification of the algal thalli.…”
Section: Methodology Coralligenous Bioconstruction Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coralligenous accretions sampled at the Actea volcano summit cone were firstly analyzed to evaluate the main taxa characterizing the bioconstruction. Taking into account the typical layers of organisms usually growing on healthy coralligenous bioconstructions (Valisano et al, 2019) we found mainly encrusting organisms and a general composition that resembles that reported for coralligenous growing on granitic lithology (Canessa et al, 2020) even if bryozoans in the present coralligenous accretions show a higher diversity. The coralligenous structure was compact and only one species of boring organism was found, the sponge Spiroxya heteroclita Topsent, 1896, highlighting a regular stratification of the algal thalli.…”
Section: Methodology Coralligenous Bioconstruction Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As well known, the growth rates of these bio-constructions are very slow (up to 0.83 mm/year) and regulated mainly by light and temperature, depending on the time period, the depth and the latitude (Ingrosso et al, 2018). The growth is counterbalanced by physical, as well as biological, eroding processes (Calcinai et al, 2015;Bertolino et al, 2017) especially where the coralligenous integrity is altered (Valisano et al, 2019). To determine when the pyroclastics were erupted underwater, we extracted four samples at the interface between the volcanic rock and the coralligenous accretion, and dated with the radiocarbon method using the AMS technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seafloor imagery is increasingly being used to study the abundance and distribution of species on the seafloor (Valisano et al, 2019). The advance and availability of exploration technologies, such as ROV-imaging, applied to previously unexplored hard bottoms, have provided a lot of in vivo information for the deep sea and reef systems, that in the last decades have revolutionized and rapidly increased the knowledge on these habitats and its threats.…”
Section: Methods Used To Detect Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coral skeletal characteristics, determining the rigidity and fragility of a colony, as well as the size and shape of individuals, determine the resistance to friction, which explains the different responses of the various species of coral to mechanical impacts (Bo et al, 2014;Fabri et al, 2014;Angiolillo and Canese, 2018). In this review, the most impacted species resulted in those that easily remain entangled due to their mediumlarge colony size, an arborescent morphology, and a flexible skeleton (e.g., Antipathella subpinnata, Leiopathes glaberrima, Callogorgia verticillata, Dendrophyllia cornigera, Paramuricea clavata, Figures 5A-D), as observed in other studies (Asoh et al, 2004;Bo et al, 2014;Valisano et al, 2019). Numerous examples from this review illustrate marine litter impacts on vulnerable (VU) and endangered (EN) species (IUCN criteria, Table 1) and sensitive habitats, such as CWCs (Orejas et al, 2009;Madurell et al, 2012), coral gardens (Bo et al, 2014(Bo et al, , 2015Fabri et al, 2014; and coralligenous assemblages (Sbrescia et al, 2008;Valisano et al, 2019) that are more vulnerable because of slow growth rate and longevity of their coral species (MacDonald et al, 1996;Consoli et al, 2018).…”
Section: Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation