2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes for systematic analysis of membrane performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). The zeta potential varied with pH due to protonation or deprotonation of surface functional groups [61,62].…”
Section: Membrane Surface Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The zeta potential varied with pH due to protonation or deprotonation of surface functional groups [61,62].…”
Section: Membrane Surface Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking at AFM images of NF membranes the differences in roughness vary considerably depending on the scan size [84,85] and the area where the topography is measured. In some areas, the membrane is very smooth [86] but in others, membrane defects from the manufacturing process show deep ridges and valleys that could accommodate bacteria and protect them from cross-flow, as can be seen in Figure 5 for the NF 270 and the NF 90 membranes.…”
Section: Surface Morphology and Microtopographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NF90 and NF270) can differ up to 100% 9,13,14,16 . The presented data (atomic force microscopy -AFM) indicated that NF90 has the roughest top layer, while NF270 has the smoothest top layer 14 . The used membranes comprise different polyamide chemistries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%