2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of reticulated ceramic foams with mercury intrusion porosimetry and mercury probe atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two measurements, which were performed for every sample type were in good agreement. The cumulative mercury volume in dependence on the pore diameter showed a comparable curve progression for large pore sizes (from 320 to approximately 75 μm); the sharp rise was caused by the filling of the strut cavities . For smaller pore sizes (<75 μm), there were visible differences, which could be matched with the process route, by considering the incremental pore volume, see Figure and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The two measurements, which were performed for every sample type were in good agreement. The cumulative mercury volume in dependence on the pore diameter showed a comparable curve progression for large pore sizes (from 320 to approximately 75 μm); the sharp rise was caused by the filling of the strut cavities . For smaller pore sizes (<75 μm), there were visible differences, which could be matched with the process route, by considering the incremental pore volume, see Figure and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The cumulative mercury volume in dependence on the pore diameter showed a comparable curve progression for large pore sizes (from 320 to approximately 75 μm); the sharp rise was caused by the filling of the strut cavities. [2] For smaller pore sizes (<75 μm), there were visible differences, which could be matched with the process route, by considering the incremental pore volume, see Figure 8 and 9. The measurements of samples with a centrifuged second coating showed a strong peak in the incremental mercury volume at around 150 nm, whereas samples with a sprayed second coating possessed double peaks in the incremental pore volume at around 200 and 500 nm.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Foam And Pore Structurementioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The capillary pressure curve (CPC) experimentally obtained by mercury intrusion (also known as the mercury intrusion capillary pressure) has been found to be among the most effective data for studying the pore structure at a relatively large scale compared with the micron‐sized scanning electron microscopy images. The heterogeneity and anisotropy of pore structures are involved in the CPC; thus, the CPC has been applied to a wide range of natural or synthetic porous media, such as shale, tight sandstone, carbonate rock, packing bed, coal rock, cement slurry, and fine sediment containing natural gas hydrate (Cai et al, ; Lei & Santamarina, ; Sang et al, ; Voigt et al, ; Wyrzykowski et al, ). From the equivalent hydraulic size distribution of the pore‐throat (SDPT) given by the CPC, many critical pore structure parameters, such as the threshold pressure and radius, the maximum displacement pressure P d and its corresponding maximum pore‐throat radius r max , the average pore‐throat radius r mean , the irreducible water saturation S wir , the structural coefficient T , and the pore‐throat radius at any saturation (e.g., r 15 , r 25 , r 50 ), can be directly determined (Nooruddin et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%