2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Salophen Co(III) Acetate Ionophore for Nitrite Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mode of chelation was also confirmed by the computational study (Fig. ) and was previously reported for ionophores of similar structure .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This mode of chelation was also confirmed by the computational study (Fig. ) and was previously reported for ionophores of similar structure .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The ion I carries a charge of Z I . E M is the membrane potential, determined by subtracting the cell potential for a membrane without ionophore from that for the sandwich membrane and so depends mainly on the host‐guest interaction .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to its potential toxicity and impact on biological systems, industry, environment, agricultural an interest has been aroused for developing large numbers of new analytical procedures for estimation trace amounts of nitrite ion in different sample types regarding environmental protection and public health (Mousavi andShirkhanloo, 2009, Yilong et al, 2015). Thus many methods have been proposed and reported in the literature for quantitation of nitrite and nitrate including: spectrophotometric methods (Sastry et al, 2002, Afkhami et al, 2004, Aydın et al, 2005, Rahshid, 2006, Al-Okab and Syed, 2007, Mohammed, 2008, Veena and Narayana, 2009, Narayana and Sunil, 2009, Hassan and Ali, 2010, Nagaraja et al, 2010, Pourreza et al, 2012, Bilal and Bashir, 2013, Porche, 2014, Galán-Vidal et al, 2014, Zhang et al, 2014, Zhang et al, 2016, Bahadoran et al, 2016, Nagaraja et al, 2016, Altunay et al, 2017, Zahedi et al, 2017, Fraihat, 2017, kinetic methods (Ghasemi et al, 2004, Shariati-Rad et al, 2017, FIA (Higuchi and Motomizu, 1999, Ensafi et al, 2004, Pourhossein et al, 2005, Pasquali et al, 2007, Yaqoob et al, 2013, electrochemical methods such as; potentiometry (Hassan et al, 2003, Vlascici et al, 2006, Crespo et al, 2015, Deng et al, 2016…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%