Characterization of salt tolerance in tomato plant in terms of photosynthesis and water relations

Comparative Transcriptome, Metabolome, and Ionome Analysis of Two Contrasting Common Bean Genotypes in Saline Conditions

“…Na + accumulation in chloroplasts affects growth mainly by disrupting the photosynthetic electron transport ( Boyer, 1976 ; Kirst, 1990 ) and inhibiting the PSII activity ( Mishra et al, 1991 ; Everard et al, 1994 ; Kao et al, 2003 ; Parida et al, 2003 ). Moreover, it decreases chlorophyll content in susceptible plants such as potato ( Abdullah and Ahmad, 1990 ), tomato ( Moghaieb et al, 2001 ), pea ( Hamada and El-Enany, 1994 ), as well as common bean ( Seemann and Critchley, 1985 ). However, Ispir, unlike TR43477, displayed a boosted carbon fixation metabolism with enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways ( Figures 2 , 3 ) and an active chlorophyll content regulation ( Figure 4A ).…”

No escape: The influence of substrate sodium on plant growth and tissue sodium responses

“…In addition, these fitness metrics can be easily applied across taxa to answer comparable questions across multiple species (Younginger et al., 2017 ). To investigate the relationship between substrate sodium and biomass changes, we retained 49 studies that reported aboveground and belowground dry biomass as well as aboveground and belowground sodium tissue concentration for a total of 107 cultivars, strains, or varieties (herein populations) of plants, in 67 species, 43 genera, and 20 families, across 16 orders (Table S1) (Abdallah et al, 2016 , Al Sherif, 2009 , Ashraf and Ahmad, 2000 , Ashraf et al, 2001 , Assaha et al, 2013 , Barhoumi et al, 2007 , Bayuelo‐Jiménez et al, 2003 , Ben Hamed et al, 2014 , Chartzoulakis et al, 1995 , Ebrahimi and Bhatla, 2011 , Ferreira et al, 2001 , Gebauer et al, 2004 , Gorai et al, 2007 , Gul et al, 2010 , Gulzar et al, 2003 , Hamilton et al, 2001 , Kafi and Rahimi, 2011 , Kchaou et al, 2010 , Keling and Zhujun, 2010 , Khan et al, 2001 , Khan et al, 2000a , Khan et al, 2000b , Khan et al, 2000c , Kim et al, 2012 , Manivannan et al, 2008 , Moghaieb et al, 2001 , Mori et al, 2006 , Naidoo, 1994 , Nedjimi, 2009 , Nedjimi, 2014 , Parida et al, 2016 , Qureshi et al, 2007 , Rejili et al, 2007 , Renault et al, 2001 , Ruiz et al, 1997 , Sanadhya et al, 2015 , Shaheen et al, 2013 , Shereen et al, 2007 , Sohail et al, 2009 , Taffouo et al, 2010 , Tammam et al,…”

Short-term response of rice and tomato to NaCl stress in relation to ion transport

“…The decrease of the OP of the tops in rice was larger than that in tomato. Moghaieb et al (2001) considered that the difference in the OP between salinized and control plants could be used as an index of osmotic adjustment (OA). In the current study, the OA values of NA40 and NA80 at 24 h were 0.35 MPa and 0.71 MPa in rice, and 0.1 MPa and 0.21 MPa in tomato.…”