1979
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0255(79)90036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of satisficing decision criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This intermediate stance takes expectations with respect to a set of probabilities; a control is justified only if it is acceptable for each expected consequence. This is similar to requirements for robustness in set-theoretic estimation, including other developments of the satisficing concept [27], [28], [40]- [43].…”
Section: B Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…This intermediate stance takes expectations with respect to a set of probabilities; a control is justified only if it is acceptable for each expected consequence. This is similar to requirements for robustness in set-theoretic estimation, including other developments of the satisficing concept [27], [28], [40]- [43].…”
Section: B Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Put another way, to satisfice is to accept the best solution so far obtained, once the cost of continuing to search exceeds the expected improvement in value were the search to continue. Many other variations of this concept have appeared in the literature [6,13,19,22,27,28,32,34,39,49,50,[53][54][55], and it is not the intent of this paper to review them in detail. Suffice it to say, however, that all of these approaches view satisficing as a species of bounded rationality: one settles for a solution that is deemed to be "good enough," but which is not necessarily, and usually not, optimal in any meaningful sense.…”
Section: Satisficingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A most accurate satisficing control may be considered for cases with large variations in and small variations in . Another limiting case occurs as , resulting in a least liable satisficing control, (18) This procedure is very conservative, and reflects a willingness to compromise the fundamental goal in the interest of reducing cost. It may be appropriate when there are large variations in relative to small variations in .…”
Section: Strongly Satisficing Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these classes, the following theorems are important in developing a synthesis procedure. Recall from (17) and (18) that and are the most discriminating controls for and , respectively. Lemma 4: For continuous accuracy support and continuous liability exposure, where (19) denotes the right derivative of , and similarly define as the right derivative of .…”
Section: An Important Special Casementioning
confidence: 99%