2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of serum biomarkers during anaphylaxis in emergency department patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IL‐6 was also elevated in anaphylaxis reaction samples but did not reach significance level ( p = .068, Figure 1A). These findings are in agreement with other studies reporting an increase in IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFRI and CCL2 in patients with anaphylaxis to different elicitors 4–6 . However, when analysing the surgical control patients, we saw a tendency of an increased level of IL‐6, IL‐10 and TNFRI following the hypotensive response in these patients during surgery despite the non‐allergic mechanism (Table ).…”
Section: Patient Id Age At Reaction (Y)a Sex Ring and Messmer Reaction Grade Culprit Drug Time From Culprit Exposure To Reaction (Min) Resupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IL‐6 was also elevated in anaphylaxis reaction samples but did not reach significance level ( p = .068, Figure 1A). These findings are in agreement with other studies reporting an increase in IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFRI and CCL2 in patients with anaphylaxis to different elicitors 4–6 . However, when analysing the surgical control patients, we saw a tendency of an increased level of IL‐6, IL‐10 and TNFRI following the hypotensive response in these patients during surgery despite the non‐allergic mechanism (Table ).…”
Section: Patient Id Age At Reaction (Y)a Sex Ring and Messmer Reaction Grade Culprit Drug Time From Culprit Exposure To Reaction (Min) Resupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We did not detect a significant increase in IL‐6 during anaphylaxis as reported by others who have compared reaction samples with baseline samples of a control group instead of with the patient's own baseline level 4,6 . This highlights the importance of including the patient's own baseline sample as the reference sample as is already standard practice for tryptase.…”
Section: Patient Id Age At Reaction (Y)a Sex Ring and Messmer Reaction Grade Culprit Drug Time From Culprit Exposure To Reaction (Min) Resupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is necessary to further compare the utility of such biomarkers to tryptase, the common biomarker for acute anaphylaxis. No other significant differences were detected for other cytokines, such as IL-1B, IL-2, IL-4, IL-8, IL-12, IL-13, IL-18, TNFα, and for complement C5a or adhesion molecule ICAM-1 [ 97 ]. Activation of the coagulation/fibrinolytic system usually appears together with the activation of the complement system, which is considered a triggering mechanism in severe anaphylaxis.…”
Section: Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the relatively late diagnostic window for serum tryptase between 30 -120 minutes after the onset of first anaphylaxis symptoms is too late concerning the necessity of rapid treatment initiation. Therefore multiple efforts have been undertaken in identifying other potential biomarkers of anaphylaxis (5)(6)(7)(8) miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression usually by silencing transcription (9). Their use as serological biomarkers has been proposed in various diseases (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%