Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2015.w4i.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Space-Division Multiplexing Fibers using Swept-Wavelength Interferometry

Abstract: Swept-wavelength interferometry can rapidly characterize the amplitude and phase transfer matrices of multi-mode fibers and components. We will show measurements of short (meter) and long (kilometer) few-mode, multi-mode, and coupled multi-core fibers.Space-division multiplexing (SDM) uses multiple spatial paths in novel fibers and components to provide capacity increases compared to single-mode fiber (SMF) systems. Integrating these paths into the same fiber can lead to reduced costs and size. Spatial paths i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The columns of the unitary input and output matrices V (ω) and U(ω) are the input and output eigenvectors of the system and describe the 2N-dimensional polarization rotation (also referred to as mode-mapping, -mixing or -scrambling in the literature) between the launched input modes and the eigenmodes ofH(ω), and the latter and the received output modes respectively. Note that the singular values λ i (ω) are the gains or losses associated with each eigenmode and their squares are equal to the eigenvalues of the phase-conjugate round-trip propagation matrixH(ω)H * (ω) [8,11].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Linear Device Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The columns of the unitary input and output matrices V (ω) and U(ω) are the input and output eigenvectors of the system and describe the 2N-dimensional polarization rotation (also referred to as mode-mapping, -mixing or -scrambling in the literature) between the launched input modes and the eigenmodes ofH(ω), and the latter and the received output modes respectively. Note that the singular values λ i (ω) are the gains or losses associated with each eigenmode and their squares are equal to the eigenvalues of the phase-conjugate round-trip propagation matrixH(ω)H * (ω) [8,11].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Linear Device Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dmd may be derived fromH(ω) by means of principle state of polarization analysis [11,21,29] where the principle delays are approximated by the eigenvalues ofH(ω + ∆ω)H −1 (ω) or by directly analyzing the impulse responsesh k ,l (t) [22,25,30]. In the latter case, distinct peaks for different mode groups h k ,l (t) will be observed and dmd may be derived from the ratio of their respective spacing and the fiber length.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Linear Device Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been several mode analysis methods, which can be categorized into two groups. One consists of methods that analyze the modes of output light based on information on the modal pattern of the electromagnetic field, such as prism-coupled mode analysis using an oblique section of an optical fiber [3] and a tapered fiber [4], the low-coherence interferometry method [5], the eigenmode expansion technique [6], the spatial and spectral (S2) imaging method [7,8,9], the swept wavelength interferometry method [10], and so on. The other consists of time-of-flight (ToF) methods such as the OTDR method [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%