1998
DOI: 10.7567/jjaps.37s2.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Superconducting Tunnel Junction X-ray Detectors by Low Temperature Scanning Electron Microscopy

Abstract: One problem in superconducting tunnel junction x-ray detectors is that the two electrodes respond differently to monochromatic x-rays, and produce double peaks in energy spectra. To study the double peak phenomenon, Low Temperature Scanning Electron Microscope (LTSEM) is a versatile tool, since it is possible to analyze two electrodes separately. From the LTSEM analyses in combination with x-ray detection experiments, it has been revealed that the intrinsic charge output of the base electrode is higher than th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 to the base and counterevents was performed by employing low temperature scanning electron microscopy ͑LTSEM͒. 6 The base and counterelectrodes of another junction on the same wafer were separately stimulated by short electron beam pulses, and the decay times of the junction response were measured at a bias voltage of 1.3 mV and at 2.1 K. The details of LTSEM can be found in other publications. 7,8 The decay time constants were 0.21 and 0.15 s for the base and counterelectrodes, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 to the base and counterevents was performed by employing low temperature scanning electron microscopy ͑LTSEM͒. 6 The base and counterelectrodes of another junction on the same wafer were separately stimulated by short electron beam pulses, and the decay times of the junction response were measured at a bias voltage of 1.3 mV and at 2.1 K. The details of LTSEM can be found in other publications. 7,8 The decay time constants were 0.21 and 0.15 s for the base and counterelectrodes, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 The decay time constants were 0.21 and 0.15 s for the base and counterelectrodes, respectively. On the other hand, in the scatter plots of the signal heights against the charge sensitive preamplifier rise times, the x-ray events were classified into two groups having mean rise times ͑20%-80%͒ of 0.15 and 0.11 s. 6 When we take a qp loss time and a tunneling time, which are described in Sec. IV, a tunneling probability should be as small as less than 35% at this high bias voltage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-depth characterization of STJs was also reported by Cristiano et al 81 and Shimizu and co-workers. 82 Low-temperature SEM was used by Ohkubo and colleagues 83 to investigate the double peaks arising from the different response of the base and counter electrode in the STJ.…”
Section: Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%