2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15020394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Supraharmonic Emission from Three Different Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructures in Time and Frequency Domain

Abstract: With the recent proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs), maintaining power quality within acceptable limits in future distribution grids will become a challenging task. A specific concern is the spread of Supraharmonics in the range from 2 to 150 kHz, generated by modern power electronic devices. In this paper, the long term Supraharmonic distortion from three differently sized electric vehicle charging infrastructures is analyzed in frequency and time domain. At the monitored sites several interruptions of E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such values of supraharmonic emissions are confirmed in [36], where the results of three parking lots are reported with low mean values (profiles of about 80 to 50 dBµA for 2 to 150 kHz) and a maximum profile (less than 5% probability) 20 dB above, with sporadic peaks for a few switching components above 0.1 Arms. Similarly, the spectra up to 50 kHz reported in [21] show a couple of vehicles with clear emissions at 10 kHz and 27 kHz with peaks in amplitude of about 0.1 and 1 A rms, but also two profiles of emissions that do not have clear peaks of the fundamental switching frequency, thus cleverly achieving a reduction of supraharmonic emissions, limited to 10 mA rms.…”
Section: Discussion Of Publications and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such values of supraharmonic emissions are confirmed in [36], where the results of three parking lots are reported with low mean values (profiles of about 80 to 50 dBµA for 2 to 150 kHz) and a maximum profile (less than 5% probability) 20 dB above, with sporadic peaks for a few switching components above 0.1 Arms. Similarly, the spectra up to 50 kHz reported in [21] show a couple of vehicles with clear emissions at 10 kHz and 27 kHz with peaks in amplitude of about 0.1 and 1 A rms, but also two profiles of emissions that do not have clear peaks of the fundamental switching frequency, thus cleverly achieving a reduction of supraharmonic emissions, limited to 10 mA rms.…”
Section: Discussion Of Publications and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A particular case is mentioned in [59] with broadband emissions between 2 and 6 kHz, that are probably of the same kind as those observed in [37] and result from the main pulse of the PFC stage. This impulsive nature is confirmed by [36] providing high-pass filtered time-domain traces, rather than a frequencydomain analysis; in particular, its Figure 9c provides a waveform quite close to those analyzed in [37].…”
Section: Discussion Of Publications and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An anti-aliasing low-pass filter R 1 C 1 , which was designed starting from a maximum frequency of 1 MHz (positioning its cutoff frequency one octave above at 2 MHz, which was very compatible with the said sampling frequency of 10 MHz) and exploiting the input capacitance of the DSO channel (found to be quite accurate and stable at 15 pF), thus resulting in a resistive value R 1 = 1.5 kΩ (negligible in terms of the voltage drop in series to the 1 MΩ input resistance of the DSO); • A high-pass filter C 2 R 2 that further attenuated the 50 Hz mains fundamental and its harmonics and designed around a resistive value large enough not to disturb the impedance matching and to remarkably influence the low-pass filter (set to 5 kΩ) and a resulting series capacitance C 2 with a negligible reactance over the desired frequency interval. The use of a high-pass filter is supported by the suggested increase of the decoupling factor in [26] and confirmed by [27] for similar measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%