Volume 6: Materials Technology; Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology; Petroleum Technology Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1115/omae2012-83934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Accuracy of the MFL Pipeline Inspection Tools

Abstract: Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) intelligent pigs are the most common tools used for pipeline inspection. But, the MFL inspection results are subject to various sources of uncertainties which must be quantified and accounted for in the integrity assessment of the inspected pipeline. A series of pull-through tests (PTT) of seven MFL tools from four service providers was performed on a 12-inch diameter pipe containing preexisting internal corrosion defects of various length, width, and depth, and located in a variety… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MFL is currently one of the most widely used NDT techniques for pipeline inspection, first introduced in 1969, and it can effectively detect metal loss, cracks, weld defects, etc. [55,56]. When the MFL tool moves through the pipeline, the magnetic flux generated by the magnet is coupled to the pipe wall through the iron brush, forming a magnetic circuit between the pipe wall and the tool.…”
Section: Magnetic Flux Leakage (Mfl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFL is currently one of the most widely used NDT techniques for pipeline inspection, first introduced in 1969, and it can effectively detect metal loss, cracks, weld defects, etc. [55,56]. When the MFL tool moves through the pipeline, the magnetic flux generated by the magnet is coupled to the pipe wall through the iron brush, forming a magnetic circuit between the pipe wall and the tool.…”
Section: Magnetic Flux Leakage (Mfl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three-axis high-resolution MFL inspection for the volumetric defects (corrosion and scratch) of long-distance transport pipelines has the dimensional accuracy of ±10%, and its confidence level exceeds 90%, so it can satisfy the regular needs of the inspection of volumetric defects in oil and gas pipelines [ 8 , 46 ]. Nevertheless, three-axis high-resolution MFL inspection is not a mature technology for the inspection and sizing of volumetric defects and crack defects in the pipeline girth weld.…”
Section: Oil and Gas Pipeline Girth Weld Defect In-line Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results confirm its efficacy. Salama [ 30 ] examined the quantification of uncertainties in MFL intelligent pigs, predominantly used for pipeline inspection, by conducting a full-scale pull-through test on a 12-inch pipe to assess detection and sizing uncertainties. Pham [ 31 ] studied the sensitivity of MFL measurement to pipeline magnetization, which is crucial for pipeline inspection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%