1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb16995.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the binding of the first selective radiolabeled histamine H3‐receptor antagonist, [125I]‐iodophenpropit, to rat brain

Abstract: 1The binding of the first selective radiolabelled histamine H3-receptor 6 Competition binding curves of H3-agonists were biphasic and showed a rightward shift upon the addition of the nonhydrolysable GTP analogue, guanosine 5'-o-(3-thio) triphosphate (GTPTyS; 100 pLM) which implicates the interaction of histamine H3-receptors with G-proteins. The affinities of the H3-receptor antagonists iodophenpropit, thioperamide and burimamide were not altered by GTPyS. 7 Histamine competition binding curves were shifted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The guanine nucleotide-sensitive, biphasic displacement could be interpreted as the result of the known agonist-induced formation of a ternary complex between the agonist-receptor complex and G-proteins as proposed by Jansen et al (1994), (for review see also Kenakin 1993), thus confirming the agonistic nature of the above drugs, already shown in the functional studies (Zingel et al 1995;Leschke et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The guanine nucleotide-sensitive, biphasic displacement could be interpreted as the result of the known agonist-induced formation of a ternary complex between the agonist-receptor complex and G-proteins as proposed by Jansen et al (1994), (for review see also Kenakin 1993), thus confirming the agonistic nature of the above drugs, already shown in the functional studies (Zingel et al 1995;Leschke et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…There has been speculation of H 3 receptor heterogeneity and subtypes based on radioligand binding [32][33][34][35] or functional assays [36][37][38][39] using native H 3 receptors. Although the existence of isoforms derived from the same gene with limited pharmacological differences may account partly for these observations, and the lack of (R)-[a-3 H]-methylhistamine binding in H 3 knock-out mice (mH 3 -/-) [30] corroborates that a single gene may give rise to the reported H 3 receptor heterogeneity, as yet the H 3 -receptor heterogeneity has not been attributed to the presence of particular H 3 -receptor isoforms.…”
Section: H 3 -Receptor Pharmacology and H 3 -Receptor Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioligand binding studies have been used extensively (e.g. Arrang et al ., 1990; Jansen et al ., 1994; Clark & Hill, 1995), together with functional bioassay studies (e.g. Arrang et al ., 1985; Clapham & Kilpatrick, 1992; Schlicker et al ., 1996), to characterize histamine H 3 ‐receptors in central nervous system tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%