2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.05.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the semi-annual-oscillation in mesospheric temperatures at low-latitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy of the observed results is possibly due to the effect of tidal aliasing in the case of earlier observations carried out from the extra-tropical latitude regions. Also Taylor et al (2005) found the SAO amplitude of ∼5-6 K over 25 month period of observation from an extra tropical latitude (20.8 • N) station, using mesospheric airglow emissions, which is higher in magnitude than ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This discrepancy of the observed results is possibly due to the effect of tidal aliasing in the case of earlier observations carried out from the extra-tropical latitude regions. Also Taylor et al (2005) found the SAO amplitude of ∼5-6 K over 25 month period of observation from an extra tropical latitude (20.8 • N) station, using mesospheric airglow emissions, which is higher in magnitude than ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This is quite surprising, as we would normally expect the maxima of a SAO-driven forcing to occur around equinox (e.g. Opio et al, 2015;Taylor et al, 2005;Williams, 1994). The fitted curve for MH-NSY GCP data shows the SAO maxima dur-ing mid-November and mid-May, while the oscillation maximizes at the beginning of December and June in the DN-NWC GCP data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the phase of the measured SAO may be determined by a number of effects. The observed difference between the SAO phase in DN-NWC and MH-NSY might originate in the phase differences between the phenomena as a function of latitude, or be due to the changes of the phenomena's phases as a function of latitude and altitude (e.g., Groves, 1972;Lysenko et al, 1994;Russell et al, 2004;Taylor et al, 2005). In order to test our hypothesis, we decided to compare the phase of the SAO in the VLF measurements to the SAO phase detected in peak emission values of the OH * 2.0 µm emission band, using the SABER (Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry) instrument on board the TIMED (Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics Dynamics) satellite (Mlynczak, 1997;Russell III et al, 1999).…”
Section: The Vlf Sao Phase and Its Comparison With Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wave packet would include a spectrum of waves consisting of a long period as well as shorter period perturbations present in the data on that night. One can notice that temperature data broadly ranged from 185 to 215 K (mean value 199.6 K) for O 2 while the OH temperature was around 175 K to 220 K, with a mean value of 196.9 K. In their report, Taylor et al (2005) concluded the periodicity of the dominant variation to be near 180 days, exhibiting a semiannual-type oscillation in the mesospheric temperatures. Further, a 15-day averaging of the mean temperatures was carried out to clearly bring out the seasonal pattern and the results are shown in plots as connecting solid lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%