The reactions of the aryl tin(II) hydrides {Ar iPr6 Sn(μ-H)} 2 (Ar iPr6 = C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 2 -2,4,6-i Pr 3 ) 2 ) and {Ar iPr4 Sn(μ-H)} 2 (Ar iPr4 = C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 3 -2,6-i Pr 2 ) 2 ) with aryl alkynes were investigated. Reaction of {Ar iPr6 Sn(μ-H)} 2 and {Ar iPr4 Sn(μ-H)} 2 with 2 equiv of diphenyl acetylene, PhCCPh, afforded the aryl alkenyl stannylenes Ar iPr6 SnC(Ph)-C(H)Ph ( 1) and Ar iPr4 SnC(Ph)C(H)Ph (2). In contrast, the analogous reactions of {Ar iPr6 Sn(μ-H)} 2 with 2 equiv of phenyl acetylene, HCCPh, afforded a high yield of the cis-1,2 addition product Ar iPr6 (H)SnC(H)C(Ph)Sn(H)Ar iPr6 (3), which has a four-membered Sn 2 C 2 core structure comprised of two Sn−Sn bonded Sn(H)Ar iPr6 units bridged by a −C(H)C(Ph)− moiety. The corresponding reaction of the less bulky hydride {Ar iPr4 Sn(μ-H)} 2 with 2 equiv of phenyl acetylene leads to Ar iPr4 SnC(H)C(Ph)Sn(H) 2 Ar iPr4 (4) which unlike 3 has no Sn−Sn bonding. Instead, the tin atoms are connected solely by a −C(H)C(Ph)− moiety. Each tin atom carries a Ar iPr4 substituent but one is also substituted by two hydrogens. The difference in behavior between PhCCPh and HCCPh is attributed mainly to the difference in steric bulk of the two substrates. The different products 3 and 4 are probably a consequence of the difference in size and dispersion force interactions of the Ar iPr6 and Ar iPr4 substituents. Compounds 1−4 were characterized by 1 H, 13 C, and 119 Sn NMR, UV−vis, and IR spectroscopy and structurally by X-ray crystallography.