2018
DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2018.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the stiffness distribution in two and three dimensions using boundary deformations: a preliminary study

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach of finding relative elastography from displacement boundary conditions is common in the elastography. [ 41–43 ] The extension and implication of the same framework with a force or stress boundary condition are discussed later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach of finding relative elastography from displacement boundary conditions is common in the elastography. [ 41–43 ] The extension and implication of the same framework with a force or stress boundary condition are discussed later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the relative match is in the order of the noise level as shown in our previous publications. 15,22 Solving for angular orientations and mechanical parameters for each grain Next, we delineate grain boundaries from image contrasts in the reconstructions of Figure 6. We illustrate this on a grain sample from Figure 7(a) with a pink overlayed mesh and extracted in Figure 7(b) for the elastic parameter C XYZ 11 .…”
Section: Reconstructions By Solving An Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reiterate that we are minimizing equation (15) for two angles at each grain, thus, we are minimizing for 2 Ã g unknowns, where g represents the number of grains. We used lsqnonlin from the optimization toolbox and selected therein the trust-region-reflective optimization algorithm in MATLAB optimization script to solve for unknowns by minimizing our objective function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the inverse model developed by Liu et al 15 for the estimation of nodule depth in prostate required a priori knowledge of the force feedback of and identical sample without a nodule, which may not be realized in practice. Notably, surface displacement as results of indentation was also used to inversely derive the distribution of shear modulus in soft tissue with stiff inclusions 16,17 and the results have shown promising capability of such methods even when high noise levels, although artificially created, were present. Other inverse methods, such as those based on artificial neural networks, [18][19][20] also require a priori knowledge of the nodule geometry or the stress distribution in the tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%