Ever since the locus of the brain clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was first described, methods available have both enabled and encumbered our understanding of its nature at the level of the cell, the tissue and the animal. A combination of in vitro and in vivo approaches has shown that the SCN is a complex heterogeneous neuronal network. The nucleus is comprised of cells that are retinorecipient and reset by photic input; those that are reset by non-photic inputs; slave oscillators that are rhythmic only in the presence of the retinohypothalamic tract; endogenously rhythmic cells, with diverse period, phase and amplitude responses; and cells that do not oscillate, at least on some measures. Network aspects of SCN organization are currently being revealed, but mapping these properties onto cellular characteristics of electrical responses and patterns of gene expression are in early stages. While previous mathematical models focused on properties of uniform coupled oscillators, newer models of the SCN as a brain clock now incorporate oscillator and gated, nonoscillator elements.
The Brain's Clock as a ConstructThe function of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was discovered during the era that identified the hypothalamus as the site of several brain "centers" governing homeostaticallyregulated behaviors. Ablation of the lateral hypothalamus resulted in a significant reduction of eating behavior and weight loss, hence an eating center. Destruction of the ventromedial hypothalamus produced obesity, hence a satiety center. The opportunity to electrically self stimulate the brain was so powerful a reward that all other motivated behaviors were put aside, hence pleasure centers. And lesions of the SCN led to dramatic behavioral and physiological arrhythmicity, hence a timekeeping center.Today, most of these center constructs have fallen out of favor. For the eating center, it was realized that "specific" hypothalamic lesions damaged fibers of passage, that lesioned animals showed sensory neglect and no longer responded to afferent inputs, and that other, major consequences accompanied weight loss in addition to disrupted feeding. For the pleasure centers, once the neural network and transmitter systems involved in self stimulation were delineated, it was obvious that no single center controlled the behavior. The notion of brain centers began to lose its heuristic value, and the centrist view was even labeled a "millstone" rather than a "milestone" to progress in neurobiology (Coscina, 1976).For the SCN, such a revision has not occurred. The body of evidence identifying the nucleus as the master circadian pacemaker in mammals is multi-disciplinary in nature, and the strength of this functional localization is unsurpassed by that of any other structure in the vertebrate NIH Public Access