2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-014-0848-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of volcanic regimes and identification of significant transitions using geophysical data: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes the methodology presented here applicable to volcanoes surrounded by a sparse monitoring seismic network (similar perhaps to HOTSPOT) in a real-time fashion. Finally, we should mention that our results complement earlier attempts to detect dynamical changes in noise or tremor signals prior to volcanic activity313233.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This makes the methodology presented here applicable to volcanoes surrounded by a sparse monitoring seismic network (similar perhaps to HOTSPOT) in a real-time fashion. Finally, we should mention that our results complement earlier attempts to detect dynamical changes in noise or tremor signals prior to volcanic activity313233.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We normalised each spectrum to its maximum value, independently of each time window. We therefore lose the information regarding the amplitude time variations but highlight the time evolution of the relative importance of each frequency bands (Carniel, 2014).…”
Section: Volcanic Tremor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To interpret the source of the seismic signal, spectral analyses are commonly performed (Konstantinou and Schlindwein, 2002;Carniel, 2014). Having only one seismic station for our period of interest, we can't discriminate between source, path and site effects.…”
Section: Volcanic Tremor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With continuously growing monitoring networks and data fluxes, this way of analyzing data becomes more and more problematic. Therefore, the seismovolcanic monitoring (similarly to many other areas) must rely more on data‐intensive automatic methods for analysis and classification of signals leading to the idea of applying methods from the area of machine learning (e.g., Carniel, , ; Orozco‐Alzate et al., ). Machine learning approaches related to seismovolcanic data are most of the time applied on single time series from individual stations to perform blind source separation with dimension reduction methods such as Independant Component Analysis (Acernese et al, ; Cabras et al, , ; Ciaramella et al, ; Capuano et al, ), Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (Cabras et al, , ), or Degenerate Unmixing Estimation Technique (Moni et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%