Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.10591-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Wood, Cork and Their Composites for Building Insulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suberin also constitutes the 20–50% of the extractive‐free bark weight, whereas the outer bark of the species of Q. suber , is mainly utilized to produce cork stoppers, agglomerates, and composites appropriate for thermal and acoustic insulation. The above findings coincide with a study by Gupta and Maji 32 dealing with suberin examination and utilization. Specifically, they reported that cork, as the outer bark layer, consists of 30% to 50% of suberin and because of the thermal insulation properties that it possesses, suberin makes bark a very promising alternative building and insulation material compared with the conventional ones (among other unique properties such as, insulating properties, hydrophobicity, visco‐elasticity, versatility, etc.).…”
Section: Bark Anatomy and Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Suberin also constitutes the 20–50% of the extractive‐free bark weight, whereas the outer bark of the species of Q. suber , is mainly utilized to produce cork stoppers, agglomerates, and composites appropriate for thermal and acoustic insulation. The above findings coincide with a study by Gupta and Maji 32 dealing with suberin examination and utilization. Specifically, they reported that cork, as the outer bark layer, consists of 30% to 50% of suberin and because of the thermal insulation properties that it possesses, suberin makes bark a very promising alternative building and insulation material compared with the conventional ones (among other unique properties such as, insulating properties, hydrophobicity, visco‐elasticity, versatility, etc.).…”
Section: Bark Anatomy and Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Then, the MoR, MoE, and TSPtPS values of BBP slightly higher compared with thermal insulating particleboard reinforced with coconut leaf sheaths (density 410 kg/m 3 , thermal conductivity 0.135 W/m•K, MoR 3.82 MPa, MoE 455 ± 94 MPa, IB 0.05 MPa), which stated to have the potential to be applied as a material building insulation (partition walls, ceiling coatings, and internal doors) (Vidil et al 2016). Indeed in the building insulator sector, mechanical properties are not primary characterizations (Gupta and Maji 2020). However, if thermal insulation materials contributed to building structures, such as those applied to wall and roof surfaces, it requires at least adequate mechanical properties.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While natural fibers have impressive mechanical and thermal insulating properties, they are not effective in preventing combustion. The enhancement of the thermal properties of fiberboard by the incorporation of fire-retardant qualities will play a crucial role in fire prevention [16]. The fire retardant qualities of the fiberboard are achieved through the incorporation of chemicals that hinder or postpone the propagation of fire following ignition [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%