2001
DOI: 10.1080/14622200125675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing concerns about post-cessation weight gain: results from a national survey of women smokers

Abstract: Differences among adult women smokers with differing levels of concern about post-cessation weight gain were investigated in a national random-digit-dialing survey. To avoid defining weight concerns in terms of possible etiologies or contributory factors, respondents were stratified using a single item querying concern about postcessation weight gain; 39% described themselves as very concerned (VC), 28% as somewhat concerned (SC), and 33% as not concerned (NC). Significant between-groups differences were detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Domains of smoking outcome expectancies can be parsed into: (1) negative consequences (i.e., expectations of smoking’s negative effects on health and social impressions); (2) positive reinforcement (i.e., expectations that smoking produces positive sensory effects and social facilitation); (3 ) negative reinforcement (i.e., expectations that smoking produces negative affect reduction); and (4) weight control (i.e., expectation that smoking aids in weight and hunger management; Brandon & Baker, 1991). Individuals who endorse stronger pro-smoking outcome expectancies tend to be at greater risk for greater cigarette dependence and smoking relapse following a quit attempt (Gwaltney, Shiffman, Balabanis, & Paty, 2005; Herd, Borland, & Hyland, 2009; Jeffries et al, 2004; Pang, Khoddam, Guillot, & Leventhal, 2014; Pomerleau, Zucker, & Stewart, 2001), putatively because they are motivated to continue smoking in order to obtain the anticipated positive emotional, social, sensory, and weight-related outcomes they believe that smoking provides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domains of smoking outcome expectancies can be parsed into: (1) negative consequences (i.e., expectations of smoking’s negative effects on health and social impressions); (2) positive reinforcement (i.e., expectations that smoking produces positive sensory effects and social facilitation); (3 ) negative reinforcement (i.e., expectations that smoking produces negative affect reduction); and (4) weight control (i.e., expectation that smoking aids in weight and hunger management; Brandon & Baker, 1991). Individuals who endorse stronger pro-smoking outcome expectancies tend to be at greater risk for greater cigarette dependence and smoking relapse following a quit attempt (Gwaltney, Shiffman, Balabanis, & Paty, 2005; Herd, Borland, & Hyland, 2009; Jeffries et al, 2004; Pang, Khoddam, Guillot, & Leventhal, 2014; Pomerleau, Zucker, & Stewart, 2001), putatively because they are motivated to continue smoking in order to obtain the anticipated positive emotional, social, sensory, and weight-related outcomes they believe that smoking provides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%