2021
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing multi‐word speech production using event‐related potentials

Abstract: Event‐related potentials (ERPs) derived from electroencephalography (EEG) have proven useful for understanding linguistic processes during language perception and production. Words are commonly produced in sequences, yet most ERP studies have used single‐word experimental designs. Single‐word designs reduce potential ERP overlap in word sequence production. However, word sequence production engages brain mechanisms in different ways than single word production. In particular, speech monitoring and planning mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(153 reference statements)
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 participants (11F, age 24.4±3.9) were recruited from The University of Texas at Austin. This is in line with sample sizes of recent EEG studies of speech production (Ries et al 2021; Zhao and Rudzicz 2015; Goregliad Fjaellingsdal et al 2020). All participants were native speakers of English with typical hearing as assessed through pure tone audiometry and a speech-in-noise hearing test (QuickSIN, Interacoustics).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21 participants (11F, age 24.4±3.9) were recruited from The University of Texas at Austin. This is in line with sample sizes of recent EEG studies of speech production (Ries et al 2021; Zhao and Rudzicz 2015; Goregliad Fjaellingsdal et al 2020). All participants were native speakers of English with typical hearing as assessed through pure tone audiometry and a speech-in-noise hearing test (QuickSIN, Interacoustics).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…While we utilized methods to correct for EMG artifact that have been previously demonstrated in the literature to be successful (Ries et al 2021; Vos et al 2010; Chen et al 2019), there is no definitive way to rule out residual EMG given the lack of ground truth in the sources that contribute to the electroencephalogram. As a result, we further explored the influence of EMG artifact on model performance by fitting linear encoding models that included normalized EMG activity recorded from auxiliary facial electrodes in tandem with the EEG as a regressor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the T2 prime elicited more negative amplitude in the left anterior and central scalp regions. Based on the time window and channel locations, the effect of the T2 prime in the current study is probably linked to a left-lateralized slow-rising negative frontal component documented in previous EEG research on speech production (Riès et al, 2013(Riès et al, , 2021, which is termed as the left-lateralized anterior negativity (LLAN) and thought to be associated with response preparation, motor planning and execution (Riès et al, 2021). Due to the pitch contour similarity between the T2 prime and the T3 sandhi variant (Nixon et al, 2015), the T2 prime probably brought benefits to the phonetic encoding or motor preparation stage, and the surface form was more likely to be encoded during this stage.…”
Section: Major Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The minimum sufficient data quantity for hyperscanning studies is yet to be established. In the meantime, novel EEG signal cleaning procedures for addressing speech-related motor artifacts are starting to emerge (e.g., Riès et al, 2021 ) and may support higher data retention rates in social interaction paradigms. Future work capitalizing on these developments as well as on ecological validity of real-time, face-to-face reciprocal social interactions and high temporal resolution of EEG will also need to investigate more fine-grained moment-to-moment associations between various social actions (e.g., eye contact, positive affect, head nods) and the neural coordination of activity between the interacting brains to more precisely characterize the mechanisms underlying social behaviors, the contributions of sex differences, and identify specific factors that facilitate or impede social synchrony.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%