1998
DOI: 10.3386/w6699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
777
0
21

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 636 publications
(810 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
777
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…This can generate a selection bias in the impact estimates 16 . Specifically, in our analysis, what type of bias can we expect?…”
Section: Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can generate a selection bias in the impact estimates 16 . Specifically, in our analysis, what type of bias can we expect?…”
Section: Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For our analysis we use the inverse probability weighting estimator. 13 This procedure aims to obtain estimates of the average treatment e¤ ect for the treated (ATT), that is, the average e¤ect for those in schools that teach the course. 14 Given a set of covariates X, assumption (2) is testable, by comparing the distributions of the probability of participation in the program between the treatment group and the controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the proper comparison of these states is in most cases not possible. Heckman et al 1998 developed a methodology to approximate this nonobservable ("counterfactual") state of a certain firm with the observable same state of another firm which is "structurally similar" to the first one according to a series of firm characteristics formally defined by a vector X. Thus, besides the group of firms which are KTT-active we need a pool of firms which are not KTT-active (control group) out of which "structurally similar" firms are selected according to a "proximity" criterion.…”
Section: Main Hypotheses Model Specification and Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%