2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the diversity of sweetpotato through growth parameters and leaf traits: Precocity and light use efficiency as important ordination factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since PAR int is determined by the aboveground biomass development, those accessions with reduced canopy cover and accelerated senescence rate presented low PAR int values, and therefore, low ε i values. There was a good correlation between tu and ε p (r Pearson = −0.62) in accordance with some studies [6,26,52], i.e., a low tu corresponded to a precocious earlier cultivar with high harvest index and also the best yields. Most of those with higher tu-late-maturing cultivar-developed more aboveground biomass than tubers, which gave them the lowest harvest index (HI) [57], and may appear to have low efficiencies due to greater respiration rate and physical loss of leaves than that of tubers [55].…”
Section: Relationship Among Efficiencies and Other Plant Traitssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since PAR int is determined by the aboveground biomass development, those accessions with reduced canopy cover and accelerated senescence rate presented low PAR int values, and therefore, low ε i values. There was a good correlation between tu and ε p (r Pearson = −0.62) in accordance with some studies [6,26,52], i.e., a low tu corresponded to a precocious earlier cultivar with high harvest index and also the best yields. Most of those with higher tu-late-maturing cultivar-developed more aboveground biomass than tubers, which gave them the lowest harvest index (HI) [57], and may appear to have low efficiencies due to greater respiration rate and physical loss of leaves than that of tubers [55].…”
Section: Relationship Among Efficiencies and Other Plant Traitssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The highest efficiencies obtained for potato genotypes in this study ( Table 5 ) were: (i) = 60.3% corresponding to 0.77 of the theoretical maximum for major crops (90%—[ 4 ]); (ii) = 6.4% corresponding to 0.68 of the theoretical maximum for C3 plants (9.4%—[ 30 ]); (iii) = 87%, near 0.97 of the highest theoretical estimated for tuber crops (90%—[ 31 ]). Table 5 , also contains the maximum efficiency values , and reported in the literature for C4 [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] and C3 [ 18 , 26 , 30 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ] crops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations