2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021ms002730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Response of Vegetation Cover to Water Limitation in Africa Using Geostationary Satellites

Abstract: Hydrological interactions between vegetation, soil, and topography are complex, and heterogeneous in semi‐arid landscapes. This along with data scarcity poses challenges for large‐scale modeling of vegetation‐water interactions. Here, we exploit metrics derived from daily Meteosat data over Africa at ca. 5 km spatial resolution for ecohydrological analysis. Their spatial patterns are based on Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) time series and emphasize limiting conditions of the seasonal wet to dry transition: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The asymptotic decay function quantifying the decay rate, independent of amplitude and timing of the event, allows comparing the rate of decay of vegetation across different climate zones, thus understanding the driving factors behind the spatial variation of λ. Initial analysis of λ showed that λ corroborates the rate of decrease in plant available water use under water limited conditions (Küçük et al, 2022). For a given level of aridity, a taller canopy decays more slowly, thus larger λ values, than a shorter one, which agrees with the previous field-based studies (Teuling et al, 2006;Boese et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seasonal Decay Rate Of Vegetation Coversupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The asymptotic decay function quantifying the decay rate, independent of amplitude and timing of the event, allows comparing the rate of decay of vegetation across different climate zones, thus understanding the driving factors behind the spatial variation of λ. Initial analysis of λ showed that λ corroborates the rate of decrease in plant available water use under water limited conditions (Küçük et al, 2022). For a given level of aridity, a taller canopy decays more slowly, thus larger λ values, than a shorter one, which agrees with the previous field-based studies (Teuling et al, 2006;Boese et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seasonal Decay Rate Of Vegetation Coversupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For instance, the impact of secondary water on vegetation can be expected to be the largest in periods of progressive water limitation. Küçük et al (2022) showed that vegetation cover decay is controlled by water availability to the first order over most of Africa, consistent with previous literature, and with theoretical expectations of dryland ecohydrology (Rodriguez-Iturbe and Porporato, 2005). The secondary moisture effects essentially act to keep water longer in the system and fuel plant accessible soil moisture for a prolonged period, which results in a delayed and buffered decay of the vegetation cover.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The was a strong correlation between April and September in both years (Figure 9c,d), whi can be attributed to differences in moisture content between the two periods, hydrothe mal characteristics, and consistency of precipitation in April and a contrary situation September. Studies indicate that FVC can increase and decrease abruptly for a short p riod, and it is positively correlated with precipitation and moisture index [59,121,123].…”
Section: Correlation Analysis Among Essential Climatic Variables (Ecv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 confidence about the possible tipping of the Amazon forest by the end of the 21 st century 37 . However, with mounting empirical evidence on how climate change influences rainforest ecosystems 6,13,38,39 , the research on rainforest resilience loss has accelerated considerably in the recent decade 40,41 . Yet, forest resilience is often assessed based on changes in forest carbon stocks 41,42 or precipitation 23,43,44 ; and rarely on actual moisture storage capacity in the root zone 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%