“…High-nuclearity coordination clusters have attracted extensive attention because of their structural diversity − and wide-ranged application prospects in the field of photoelectron devices, − electrical conductivity, metal–organic catalysis, and fluorescent sensing. − As a common aggregate of copper(I) atoms coordinated with halide anions, cuprous iodide clusters exhibited a variety of molecular arrays with rich electronic structures, including neutral, cationic, and anionic [Cu x I y ] x − y coordination moieties. − In the neutral cuprous iodide cluster aggregates [CuI] x , uncharged organic/inorganic ligands can support and stabilize the [CuI] x cores via Cu–N, Cu–S, or Cu–P coordination interactions, − such as Cu 2 I 2 rhomboid dimers, − Cu 3 I 3 trimers, Cu 4 I 4 cubane tetramers, , Cu 6 I 6 staircase hexamers, − Cu 7 I 7 pinwheel heptamers, − Cu 8 I 8 staircase octamers, and so forth. In order to construct ionic cuprous iodide clusters with high nuclearity, some cationic heteroleptic ligands were developed and reacted with copper iodide salt. − Up to date, it has rarely been reported for anionic cuprous iodide clusters, such as [Cu 4 I 6 (TPP) 2 ](TPP = alkyl-tris(2-pyridyl)phosphonium halides), [Cu 6 I 7 ] − , [L 4 (Cu 3 I 4 ) 4 ] 8+ , and so on . Among these ionic cuprous iodide cluster systems, the [Cu x I y ] x − y coordination moieties with a highly nuclear nature were self-assembled as driven by the intramolecular electrostatic interaction from anion–cation pairs in the aggregation process. , However, the structural diversity is influenced by multiple factors, which increase the difficulty in the controlling synthesis of ionic cuprous iodide clusters. ,,− …”