“…However, the charge injection and transport are unbalanced in iPLEDs that use ITO or fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) as the cathode; n-type metal oxide, such as zinc oxide (ZnO), hafnium oxide (HfO 2 ) or zirconium oxide (ZrO 2 ), as the electron-injection/transport layer; poly(9,9 0 -dioctylfluorene-cobenzo-thiadiazole) (F8BT) or poly(phenylvinylene): super yellow as the emissive layer; molybdenum oxide (MoO 3 ) or nickel oxide (NiO) as hole injection/transport layer and gold (Au) as the anode. In fact, the hole injection in this type of device indicates an ohmic contact from the MoO 3 /Au to the highest occupied molecular orbital level of the emissive layer 25,26 , whereas the electroninjection rates are fairly low because of the considerable energy barrier difference between the conduction band (CB) of the n-type metal oxides and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the emissive layer [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][27][28][29][30] . Recently, various strategies have been applied to promote electron injection and transport by controlling the interface between the CB of the n-type metal oxide and the LUMO of the emissive layer by using an interlayer, such as ionic liquid molecules (ILMs) 27 , conjugated polyelectrolyte 28,29 , self-assembled dipole monolayer 15 Here we show highly efficient iPLEDs by introducing a spontaneously formed ripple-shaped nanostructure of ZnO (ZnO-R) and applying an amine-based polar solvent treatment using 2-methoxyethanol (2-ME) and ethanolamine (EA) cosolvents (2-ME þ EA) to the ZnO-R.…”