1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.66.1318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-density-wave structure inNbSe3determined by scanning tunneling microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
17
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When we consider the transition from the CDW band edge as the dominant process for the probe signal, the resonance energy should be shifted by the amount of gap energy. 2⌬ g2 is approximately 65-100 meV, 3,8,9 which is consistent with the difference in the resonance. Note that the probe signal also reflects the upper edge of the occupied electron band.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…When we consider the transition from the CDW band edge as the dominant process for the probe signal, the resonance energy should be shifted by the amount of gap energy. 2⌬ g2 is approximately 65-100 meV, 3,8,9 which is consistent with the difference in the resonance. Note that the probe signal also reflects the upper edge of the occupied electron band.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, in addition we find that Se atoms of column I1 also take part in the modulation, with amplitudes comparable to Se(II1) and Se(1). Contrary to the interpretation of (Dai et al, 1991) this does not imply that the CDW 213 S. VAN …”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Results obtained at 4 K in liquid helium suggested that all three chains carry a strong CDW modulation. [17][18][19] A controversy arose because x-ray diffraction results showed that the largest displacive modulations occur on Nb͑III͒ and Nb͑I͒ while smaller displacive modulations affect the Se atoms of chains I, II, and III directly bonded to Nb͑III͒ and Nb͑I͒. 15 This discrepancy between x-ray diffraction and STM results, concerning the strong q 2 CDW modulation measured by STM on chains II, was partially solved by tight-binding calculations for a slab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%