1972
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.5.2536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Dependence of Ionization Energy Loss for Relativistic Heavy Nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we shall take a complementary semi-analytic approach by using the analytic expression for the second Born cross section for the Coulomb scattering of the electron off the atomic nucleus (McKinley & Feshbach 1948;Feshbach 1952). For nuclei Z 26, the inclusion up to the second Born approximation is sufficiently accurate (Eby & Morgan 1972). In the following sections, however, we will confirm that the interpolations with respect to Z and the electron energies done by the previous authors are remarkably accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this paper, we shall take a complementary semi-analytic approach by using the analytic expression for the second Born cross section for the Coulomb scattering of the electron off the atomic nucleus (McKinley & Feshbach 1948;Feshbach 1952). For nuclei Z 26, the inclusion up to the second Born approximation is sufficiently accurate (Eby & Morgan 1972). In the following sections, however, we will confirm that the interpolations with respect to Z and the electron energies done by the previous authors are remarkably accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The Mott correction was first observed experimentally by Tarle and Solarz [12] and later measured with greater precision by Salamon et al [13]. It was first calculated by Eby and Morgan [14,15] by numerical integration of (2) for several values of Z and 𝛽. These calculations demonstrated the significance of Mott's correction to the Bethe−Bloch formula for incident nuclei with Z ≥ 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to apply these corrections, we made a thorough review of treatments made by different authors, in particular those in Refs. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. The treatments, usually made for the stopping power, were extended to the calculations of mean free paths and straggling.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%