2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-008-0429-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Order versus Superconductivity in Inhomogeneous Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that microscopic theories of superconductivity are incapable of describing specific materials precisely, although together they give an adequate overall picture. In this connection, the failure of the most sophisticated approaches to make any prediction of true or, at least "bare" T c , (provided that the corresponding T c -value is not known a priori) despite hundreds of existing superconductors with varying fascinating properties, forced Phillips [63] to reject all apparently first-principle continuum theories in favor of his own percolative filamentary theory of superconductivity [64][65][66][67] (see also the random attractive Hubbard model studies of superconductivity [68,69] and the analysis of competition between superconductivity and charge density waves studied in the framework of similar scenarios [70][71][72]). We totally agree with such considerations in the sense of the important role of disorder in superconductors with high T c on the verge of crystal lattice instability [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that microscopic theories of superconductivity are incapable of describing specific materials precisely, although together they give an adequate overall picture. In this connection, the failure of the most sophisticated approaches to make any prediction of true or, at least "bare" T c , (provided that the corresponding T c -value is not known a priori) despite hundreds of existing superconductors with varying fascinating properties, forced Phillips [63] to reject all apparently first-principle continuum theories in favor of his own percolative filamentary theory of superconductivity [64][65][66][67] (see also the random attractive Hubbard model studies of superconductivity [68,69] and the analysis of competition between superconductivity and charge density waves studied in the framework of similar scenarios [70][71][72]). We totally agree with such considerations in the sense of the important role of disorder in superconductors with high T c on the verge of crystal lattice instability [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%