1978
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge stabilization mechanism in the visual and purple membrane pigments.

Abstract: The effects of charged groups of rhodopsin and bacteriorhodopsin on the potential energy surface of their chromophore are examined, taking into account the protein dielectric effect. It is found that the barriers for twisting double bonds of an isolated chromophore can be drastically reduced when the chromophore interacts with the protein charges. New types of local minima are found in the ground-state potential surface of the protein-chromophore complex. These minima correspond to "charge-stabilized intermedi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of water could then result in a displacement of positive charge away from Schiff base nitrogen and toward this side group, effectively neutralizing its negative charge while decreasing the magnitude of the local electrostatic field near the Schiff base nitrogen. In our opinion, such a mechanism could readily be incorporated into several recent models of retinylidene-opsin interaction (Harosi et al, 1978;Warshel, 1978;Honig et al, 1979a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Removal of water could then result in a displacement of positive charge away from Schiff base nitrogen and toward this side group, effectively neutralizing its negative charge while decreasing the magnitude of the local electrostatic field near the Schiff base nitrogen. In our opinion, such a mechanism could readily be incorporated into several recent models of retinylidene-opsin interaction (Harosi et al, 1978;Warshel, 1978;Honig et al, 1979a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The visible absorption maximum of rhodopsin (498 nm) is substantially red-shifted compared t o that of the unbound prosthetic group, 1 1-cis, 12s-cis-retinal (376 nm in ethanol). Considerable experimental evidence (Honig and Ebrey, 1974; Sulkes et a/., 1978;Eyring and Mathies, 1979; Aton et a/., 1980) supports the idea that much of this bathochromic shift is due t o direct protonation of the Schiff base which links the retinylidene group to opsin, although partial protonation involving hydrogen bonding has also been suggested (Harosi et a/., 1978). Additional secondary interactions between the retinylidene group and the protein are required t o explain the full magnitude of the bathochromic shift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reliable analysis of the energetics of ion pairs in proteins presents a major challenge and has been the subject of significant conceptual confusions (see discussions in Refs [3] and [12]). The most common confusion is the intuitive assumption that ion pairs are more stable in nonpolar environments rather than less stable in nonpolar environments (see analysis in Refs [154] and [155]). Excellent examples of this confusion are provided even in recent studies (e.g., [156]) and in most of the desolvation models (e.g., [157][158][159]) which are based on the assumption that enzymes destabilize their ground states by placing them in nonpolar environments.…”
Section: Ion Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If similar interaction energy surfaces as ours could be obtained by the other mechanism, we would not adhere to the steric hindrance mechanism. From this point of view, it is interesting to see what energy surfaces would be obtained in the charge stabilization model of Warshel (1978).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%