1988
DOI: 10.1080/02773818808070679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge-Transfer Complexes in Kraft Lignin Part 2: Contribution to Color

Abstract: Chelation and removal of transition metals from the kraft lignin employed in this study did not reduce the lignin's visible absorbance.Likewise, hydrogenation of carbon-carbon double bonds in this lignin also had no effect on its visible spectrum. This indicated that extended conjugated systems were not a significant contributor to the color of this lignin. Of the structures investigated, quinones were found to be the major visible-light absorbing chromophores. Since a large component of the quinone's absorpti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are broadly consistent with the charge transfer model previously proposed for the optical properties of HS and CDOM (12,13) and lignins (13,24). This model predicts that elimination of electron acceptor groups or moieties (quinoid, aromatic ketone, or carbonyl moieties in other structures) by NaBH 4 reduction will lead to the preferential loss of long-wavelength absorption due to the elimination of the lower energy charge transfer transitions (12,13; Figures 1-4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results are broadly consistent with the charge transfer model previously proposed for the optical properties of HS and CDOM (12,13) and lignins (13,24). This model predicts that elimination of electron acceptor groups or moieties (quinoid, aromatic ketone, or carbonyl moieties in other structures) by NaBH 4 reduction will lead to the preferential loss of long-wavelength absorption due to the elimination of the lower energy charge transfer transitions (12,13; Figures 1-4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…22,42 Although the longer wavelength, visible absorption (>400 nm) still cannot be explained directly from either lignin derivatives or CRAM corresponding to these low mass (<600 Da) compounds, aggregation could facilitate charge transfer interactions between electron acceptors (e.g., aromatic ketones/aldehydes and quinones) and donors (e.g., alkoxy aromatics), both of which are known to be present within lignin derivatives. 21,25,43 Indeed, previous work 32,34 has indicated that the electrospray ionization process may cause disaggregation of high molecular weight species. The view that humic substances are composed primarily of aggregates of relatively low molecular weight components 44,45 is compatible with a model in which intramolecular charge transfer interactions between lignin-derived molecules of these aggregates give rise to the unique absorption and emission properties of these materials.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interactions are capable of producing new, lower energy, optical CT transitions 85,124,126 arising from short-range contacts between hydroxy-/methoxy-aromatic electron donors and carbonyl-containing electron acceptors. 74,85,89,127,128 The CT model thus proposes that the long-wavelength absorption and emission in the near-UV and visible results primarily from intramolecular CT complexes between hydroxy-/methoxy-aromatic electron donors and carbonyl-containing electron acceptors formed through the partial oxidation of lignin precursors. 74,85,89,127,128 Within lignin, electron donors could include phenols and/or methoxylated phenols, while acceptors could include quinones and/or (aromatic) ketones/aldehydes.…”
Section: Structural Basis Of Absorption/emission Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%