2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.155502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge Transfer Doping of Silicon

Abstract: We demonstrate a novel doping mechanism of silicon, namely n-type transfer doping by adsorbed organic cobaltocene (CoCp2*) molecules. The amount of transferred charge as a function of coverage is monitored by following the ensuing band bending via surface sensitive core-level photoelectron spectroscopy. The concomitant loss of electrons in the CoCp2* adlayer is quantified by the relative intensities of chemically shifted Co2p components in core-level photoelectron spectroscopy which correspond to charged and n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the interface dipoles formed by the transferred electrons in the oxide and the compensating H + ions in the water layer set up a potential step Δφ C that also contributes to the lowering of work function. The potential drop Δφ C can be modeled by a parallel‐plate capacitorΔϕnormalC=qQCwhere C □ = ε I ε 0 / d is the interface capacitance per unit area of the oxide/water interface layer with relative permittivity ε I and d is the distance between the center of gravity of the two charge populations, while q is the magnitude of the elementary charge . A distance d = 4.62 Å is used, which results from adding the length of an OH bond (1.1 Å), a hydrogen bond (1.97 Å), and half the thickness of water layer (1.55 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the interface dipoles formed by the transferred electrons in the oxide and the compensating H + ions in the water layer set up a potential step Δφ C that also contributes to the lowering of work function. The potential drop Δφ C can be modeled by a parallel‐plate capacitorΔϕnormalC=qQCwhere C □ = ε I ε 0 / d is the interface capacitance per unit area of the oxide/water interface layer with relative permittivity ε I and d is the distance between the center of gravity of the two charge populations, while q is the magnitude of the elementary charge . A distance d = 4.62 Å is used, which results from adding the length of an OH bond (1.1 Å), a hydrogen bond (1.97 Å), and half the thickness of water layer (1.55 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has just been done for Δφ C . For the connection between Q and the change in band bending, we extended the solution to the 1D Poisson equation reported by Rietwyk et al to include both bulk donor N D and acceptor N A concentrations as well. The result readsQ=2εnormalSε0kT[]NDexpnormalΔEnormalFEVBMkTΔEFEnormalVBMkT1+NAexpnormalΔEnormalFEVBMkT+ΔEFEnormalVBMkT1Here, ε S is the relative permittivity of the oxide, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T = 298 K (room temperature).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…h) Experimentally determined doping efficiency (data points) and the calculated probability P + of positive charge on a CoCp 2 * molecule (line) as a function of coverage. h) Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2014, American Physical Society.…”
Section: Sctd In 1d Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, solid organic or inorganic molecules with appropriate band energy levels are promising candidates. It has been reported that stable p‐type SCTD in Si NWs can be achieved via surface coating with F4‐TCNQ or MoO 3 thin films, while an n‐type SCTD of Si NWs has been realized by the adsorption of organic cobaltocene (CoCp 2 *) molecules . Besides electrical characterization, the Si core‐level shift in photoelectron spectroscopy also revealed the efficient doping process induced by interfacial charge transfer.…”
Section: Sctd In 1d Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the depth profile of energetics at the interface is paramount to understanding the operation of thin film devices and two key methods for measuring this have matured. One involves a stepwise growth of a film onto a substrate with concurrent photoemission or Kelvin probe analysis performed in ultrahigh vacuum with interconnected deposition and analysis chambers and the other, is to cleave or mill and polish a complete device and measure the work function across the cross‐section using a scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy in air, or nitrogen atmosphere to minimize oxygen and humidity (if the measurement atmosphere was unstated in the paper it was presumed air). The stepwise approach using photoemission is more common and offers detailed electronic and chemical analysis with high surface sensitivity of ≈5–10 nm (laboratory based light source) but can be slow and cumbersome to perform, especially when the substrate is heated during the deposition and subsequently cooled to room‐temperature for analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%