2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4792042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transport in lightly reduced graphene oxide: A transport energy perspective

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inA detailed analysis of current-voltage characteristics of Au/perylene-monoimide/n-Si Schottky barrier diodes over a wide temperature range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Arrhenius plot at a high temperature regime (above 220 K), as shown in the inset of Figure 3b, it yields the E a value of ∼70.2 meV which is relatively higher compared to the previously reported values for N-doped graphene 13 and rGO. 44,45 Generally, graphene with less structural defects or impurities would give low E a as it is much easier for the electrons to be excited from the VB to the conduction band (CB) at room temperature. However, in our case, the higher E a in the N-rGO would be attributed to the existence of structural defects and disorders in the carbon network, consistent with the findings from Raman spectra (see Figure S4) and N 1s peak of XPS (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Arrhenius plot at a high temperature regime (above 220 K), as shown in the inset of Figure 3b, it yields the E a value of ∼70.2 meV which is relatively higher compared to the previously reported values for N-doped graphene 13 and rGO. 44,45 Generally, graphene with less structural defects or impurities would give low E a as it is much easier for the electrons to be excited from the VB to the conduction band (CB) at room temperature. However, in our case, the higher E a in the N-rGO would be attributed to the existence of structural defects and disorders in the carbon network, consistent with the findings from Raman spectra (see Figure S4) and N 1s peak of XPS (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As known in literature and mentioned above, a widespread defect is related to oxygen functional groups (with sp 3 hybridization), bridge-bonded to the graphene planes, supposed to create potential barriers between sp 2 hybridised crystalline and disordered regions [37,42,44,56]. It has been suggested before, that the barrier height depends on the local density of oxygen functional groups within the disordered regions and it can explain the large resistance that the VRH model predicts at low temperatures [42,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…SEM observations and micro-analysis have revealed a morphology consisting of partially overlapped small flakes of rGO. These comprise conducting graphene-like sp 2 regions [56], as suggested by the presence of high wavenumber broader bands in the Raman spectrum (Figure 6) and by SEM analysis (Figure 3B). These sp 2 domains have a size of L a 16.3 nm, at RT, and are embedded in GO disordered regions [42,56], with a mean distance among defects of L D 11 nm at RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As known in literature and mentioned above, a widespread defect is related to oxygen functional groups (with sp 3 hybridization), bridge-bonded to the graphene planes, supposed to create potential barriers between sp 2 hybridised crystalline and disordered regions [39,44,46,57]. It has been suggested before, that the barrier height depends on the local density of oxygen functional groups within the disordered regions and it can explain the large resistance that the VRH model predicts at low temperatures [44,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…SEM observations and micro-analysis have revealed a morphology consisting of partially overlapped small flakes of rGO. These comprise conducting graphene-like sp 2 regions [57], as suggested by the presence of high wavenumber broader bands in the Raman spectrum (Figure 6) and by SEM analysis (Figure 3B). These sp 2 domains have a size of L a 16.3 nm, at RT, and are embedded in GO disordered regions [44,57], with a mean distance among defects of L D 11 nm at RT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%