“…It has been suggested that molecular junctions can be seen as “series tunneling junctions” where each molecular component forms a distinct part of the tunnel junction. − According to this view of molecular junctions, here, the alkyl chain and BPh units pose two distinct tunneling barriers in series where the tunneling barrier widths are defined by the lengths of the alkyl chain (which depends on n ), d alk , and the BPh unit, d BPh , and tunneling barrier heights are defined by the alkyl chain, φ alk , and BPh unit, φ BPh (Figure c). Thus, in principle, the junctions are double-barrier junctions with the corresponding tunneling decay coefficients along the alkyl chain, β alk , and BPh units, β BPh , given by eq In general, the aromatic part poses a lower φ than the aliphatic molecules (as indicated in Figure c); consequently, aromatic molecules have typical values of β in the range of 0.2–0.4 Å –1 , − whereas aliphatic molecules have β of 0.8 Å –1 . In addition, others have suggested that intermolecular tunneling (where charges tunnel from one molecule to another) may be important for molecules with large tilt angles. − In case the double-barrier picture holds, the tunneling rates are determined by the BPh units for small values of n , and the red arrows in Figure a indicate that the tunneling direction should be determined by the tilt angle of the BPh units, which, in turn, should influence the directional plasmon launching as indicated by the blue arrows.…”