2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.l061901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charges, conserved quantities, and fluxes in de Sitter spacetime

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the dictionary between Bondi and Fefferman-Graham gauges [59], the authors used earlier results in Fefferman-Graham gauges to define a new class of asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes. In their follow-up work [60], in order to obtain finite charges and fluxes, these authors introduce a holographic renormalization procedure while all charges and fluxes are naturally finite in this paper and do not require any ad hoc regularization. The latter work also states more clearly that their interest is in spacetimes with compact spatial slices, as opposed to this work.…”
Section: B Full Nonlinear Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the dictionary between Bondi and Fefferman-Graham gauges [59], the authors used earlier results in Fefferman-Graham gauges to define a new class of asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes. In their follow-up work [60], in order to obtain finite charges and fluxes, these authors introduce a holographic renormalization procedure while all charges and fluxes are naturally finite in this paper and do not require any ad hoc regularization. The latter work also states more clearly that their interest is in spacetimes with compact spatial slices, as opposed to this work.…”
Section: B Full Nonlinear Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, for asymptotically local de Sitter spacetimes, discussions on conservative charges can be found in Refs. [41][42][43][44]. Despite the absence of a surface integral formula for the conservative charge related to the NUT parameter, the authors of [32] have shown that defining leads to a nice generalized Smarr mass formula and can produce the expected entropy as a quarter of the black hole area.…”
Section: Non-flat Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15]). Leaky boundary conditions can be considered in other types of asymptotics, such as asymptotically flat spacetimes [16][17][18][19][20][21] where they yield the famous Bondi mass loss formula [22,23], at the future boundary of asymptotically dS spacetime [7,8,[24][25][26][27][28], as well as at boundaries located at finite distance [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%