Charges, monopoles and duality relations

Comay, E.

doi:10.1007/bf02723118

Cited by 10 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conclusion A is obtained from a pure theoretical analysis [19] [20]. It turns out that it has a striking manifestation in physical data.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields

Comay¹

2018

OALib

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the paper is to use fundamental theoretical and experimental elements of electrodynamics for deriving properties of radiation fields and of bound fields. A wide variety of examples prove that radiation fields and bound fields do not represent the same physical object. This conclusion is new. Some examples belong to the classical domain and others belong to the quantum domain. Consequences of this outcome affect several physical issues. In particular, these fields should be treated separately. For this reason, changes must be introduced to the present form of the fields' Lagrangian density of quantum electrodynamics, where the fields tensor F µν is a sum of bound and radiation fields. Since the Lagrangian density is a key element of the theory, its revision may entail changes of other specific issues. The recent failure of quantum electrodynamics to explain the electron and the muon data of the proton charge radius supports this conclusion.

show abstract

“…Conclusion A is obtained from a pure theoretical analysis [19] [20]. It turns out that it has a striking manifestation in physical data.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields

Comay¹

2018

OALib

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The consistency of physical attributes of QCD with relevant experimental data is examined below. The same procedure is carried out for a strong interaction theory that is based on a regular charge-monopole theory (RCMT) [6,7,8,9,10]. Articles [8,9,10] demonstrate the clear advantage of the RCMT over QCD.…”

Section: Fig 1 Elements Of the Structure Of A Quantum Field Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here the duality transformation connects charges to monopoles (see [13], p. 1363). The theory is derived from a regular Lagrangian density [6,7,8,9]. Therefore, its structure follows well established physical principles.…”

Section: An Outline Of Qcd and The Rcmtmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Study of Quantum Chromodynamics and the Regular Charge-Monopole Theory

Comay¹

2020

PSIJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The compatibility of the strong interaction theory called Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) with relevant experimental data is critically examined. The clear advantage of the Regular ChargeMonopole Theory over QCD is explained. An analysis of new data provides further support for this claim. The paper points out several specific effects that illustrate this conclusion: the hard photon-nucleon interaction, the striking difference between the high energy electron-proton and proton-proton cross section, the peripheral location of the proton’s antiquark, the strong CP problem, the quite large amount of the ss ¯ pair in the proton, the excess of the proton’s d¯antiquarks over its u¯ antiquarks, and the spin-dependence of high energy polarized proton-proton scattering. These problematic issues are in accordance with M. Gell-Mann’s recently published qualms about the QCD merits.

show abstract

“…The second postulate was used for constructing a different charge-monopole electrodynamics [24,25]. This postulate guarantees that the constraints imposed by the two lower rank theories are satisfied.…”

Section: Duality Transformations Of Electromagnetic Fieldsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The classical limit of quantum mechanics is discussed in the literature (see [5], pp.19-21 and elsewhere; [6], pp. [25][26][27][137][138].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical Consequences of Mathematical Principles

Comay

2009

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physical consequences are derived from the following mathematical structures: the variational principle, Wigner's classifications of the irreducible representations of the Poincare group and the duality invariance of the homogeneous Maxwell equations.The analysis is carried out within the validity domain of special relativity. Hierarchical relations between physical theories are used. Some new results are pointed out together with their comparison with experimental data. It is also predicted that a genuine Higgs particle will not be detected.

show abstract

Charges, monopoles and duality relations

Cited by 10 publications

References 11 publications

Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields

Inherent Differences between Bound and Radiation Fields

A Critical Study of Quantum Chromodynamics and the Regular Charge-Monopole Theory

Physical Consequences of Mathematical Principles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About