Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics - 1999
DOI: 10.3115/1034678.1034741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charting the depths of robust speech parsing

Abstract: We describe a novel method for coping with ungrammatical input based on the use of chart-like data structures, which permit anytime processing. Priority is given to deep syntactic analysis. Should this fail, the best partial analyses are selected, according to a shortest-paths algorithm, and assembled in a robust processing phase. The method has been applied in a speech translation project with large HPSG grammars.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our current level of success has been achieved without significant changes to the original grammar and, once we start to tailor the grammar to the domain, we will gain further significant increases in performance. As a final stage, we may find it useful to follow Kasper et al (1999) and have a 'fallback' strategy for failed parses where the best partial analyses are assembled in a robust processing phase.…”
Section: Evaluation and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our current level of success has been achieved without significant changes to the original grammar and, once we start to tailor the grammar to the domain, we will gain further significant increases in performance. As a final stage, we may find it useful to follow Kasper et al (1999) and have a 'fallback' strategy for failed parses where the best partial analyses are assembled in a robust processing phase.…”
Section: Evaluation and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm runs with a worst-case time linear in the number of edges and vertices. In [23], different methods for partial parse selection are presented and evaluated for HPSG parsers producing much deeper analyses than the parser presented here. The criteria examined for selecting partial parsers include longest edges and shortest paths using several weight estimation functions based on probabilities derived from treebanks.…”
Section: Fig 3 Transferred Dependency Tree (Left) and Its Corresponmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other properties, such as prosodic information or probabilistic scores could also be utilized in the estimation function. A detailed description of the approach can be found in (Kasper et al, 1999). Note that the paths PR and QR are chosen, but not ST, although S is the longest edge.…”
Section: Computing Best Partial Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%