2001
DOI: 10.1086/319612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHAT Oral Polio Vaccine Was Not the Source of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Group M for Humans

Abstract: A book published in 1999 hypothesized that the scientists who worked with the CHAT type 1 attenuated poliomyelitis strain, tested in the former Belgian Congo in the late 1950s, had covertly prepared the vaccine in chimpanzee kidney cells contaminated with a simian immunodeficiency virus, which evolved into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M. This article summarizes the results of the investigation conducted by the author to determine the legitimacy of the accusation. Testimony by eyewitnesses, histori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in The Origin of AIDS (Pepin 2011), a book that has emerged as the model for the explanation for AIDS, physician and historian Jacques Pepin devotes three pages to The River. Pepin bases his dismissal of Hooper on Plotkin's argument and (mistakenly) accuses Hooper of a rookie mistake in confusing local dilution of concentrated vaccine stock with local production or amplification (Gellin et al 2001;Pepin 2011, 52). Somewhat bizarrely, Pepin bases his account solely on the word of the scientists who ran the trial and accuses anyone who would doubt his reliance on the defendant scientist's account of conspiracy thinking.…”
Section: The Final Report: Ambivalent Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in The Origin of AIDS (Pepin 2011), a book that has emerged as the model for the explanation for AIDS, physician and historian Jacques Pepin devotes three pages to The River. Pepin bases his dismissal of Hooper on Plotkin's argument and (mistakenly) accuses Hooper of a rookie mistake in confusing local dilution of concentrated vaccine stock with local production or amplification (Gellin et al 2001;Pepin 2011, 52). Somewhat bizarrely, Pepin bases his account solely on the word of the scientists who ran the trial and accuses anyone who would doubt his reliance on the defendant scientist's account of conspiracy thinking.…”
Section: The Final Report: Ambivalent Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SV40 is not pathogenic in monkeys but has been found to be pathogenic in humans. There are some claims that this transmission of SV40 from monkeys to humans via contaminated kidney cell cultures used for the production of polio vaccination is now the cause of HIV which has been refuted [7].…”
Section: Vaccine Production Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%