2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chatbot Feedback on Students’ Writing: Typology of Comments and Effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the employment of generative AI only strengthens those claims. The positive impact was evident in students' achievements in terms of generation of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences, and improved grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers (Allagui, 2023;Kohnke et al, 2023;Su et al, 2023;Wang & Guo, 2023). The delayed post-test results in this study add to the generalizability of the positive impact claims (Rose et al, 2020).…”
Section: Positive Impact On Writing Skillssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the employment of generative AI only strengthens those claims. The positive impact was evident in students' achievements in terms of generation of focused ideas, better connection among ideas and sentences, and improved grammatical accuracy, which were also claimed by previous researchers (Allagui, 2023;Kohnke et al, 2023;Su et al, 2023;Wang & Guo, 2023). The delayed post-test results in this study add to the generalizability of the positive impact claims (Rose et al, 2020).…”
Section: Positive Impact On Writing Skillssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is more student-friendly and can provide more need-based assistance than other AWE tools, as suggested by Guo et al (2022) and Rudolph et al (2023). It can support student writing by providing appropriate directions related to content and organization as they write (Allagui, 2023). Since it can automatically train itself and learn from previous conversations (Chan & Hu, 2023), students can receive tailored feedback suitable for individual needs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%