2020
DOI: 10.1093/database/baaa048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHDGKB: a knowledgebase for systematic understanding of genetic variations associated with non-syndromic congenital heart disease

Abstract: Abstract Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common birth defects, with complex genetic and environmental etiologies. The reports of genetic variation associated with CHD have increased dramatically in recent years due to the revolutionary development of molecular technology. However, CHD is a heterogeneous disease, and its genetic origins remain inconclusive in most patients. Here we present a database of genetic variations for non-syndromic CHD (N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) MIGD is a genetic database with multi-omics data and provides researchers a systematic perspective on the molecular mechanism of MI. Most of the genetic databases only contain genetic variation data [60] , [61] , [62] , but MIGD includes also multi-omics data, gene-drug interactions, GO terms and KEGG pathways for MI studies. (3) MIGD provides users with a network visualization tool to show the gene-omics factor-MI interactions and gene-drug interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) MIGD is a genetic database with multi-omics data and provides researchers a systematic perspective on the molecular mechanism of MI. Most of the genetic databases only contain genetic variation data [60] , [61] , [62] , but MIGD includes also multi-omics data, gene-drug interactions, GO terms and KEGG pathways for MI studies. (3) MIGD provides users with a network visualization tool to show the gene-omics factor-MI interactions and gene-drug interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%