2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Check-all-that-apply data analysed by Partial Least Squares regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar explained variance results were found in sensory analysis with nontrained and trained panellists (Veramendi et al, 2013;Kostov et al, 2014). However, it is important to notice that CA explains the part of the data which holds the information of interest (Rinnan et al, 2015). Rinnan et al (2015) have indicate that, although CA is by far the most common analytical tool applied in this type of response data, the model does not contain any information regarding the uncertainty in the different attributes (which accounts for a large part of the data variation).…”
Section: Aroma Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar explained variance results were found in sensory analysis with nontrained and trained panellists (Veramendi et al, 2013;Kostov et al, 2014). However, it is important to notice that CA explains the part of the data which holds the information of interest (Rinnan et al, 2015). Rinnan et al (2015) have indicate that, although CA is by far the most common analytical tool applied in this type of response data, the model does not contain any information regarding the uncertainty in the different attributes (which accounts for a large part of the data variation).…”
Section: Aroma Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This analysis showed that two factors accounted for 24% of the variability of the data. Rinnan et al (2015) have indicate that, although CA is by far the most common analytical tool applied in this type of response data, the model does not contain any information regarding the uncertainty in the different attributes (which accounts for a large part of the data variation). This low proportion is expected considering the complexity in the odour sample profile, besides when CA is used to analyse a sorting task, it could underestimate the proportion of explained variance (Veramendi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Aroma Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We considered an effect positive or negative if the associated probability of being zero was smaller than 5%. Jack-knife resampling was used to test the significance of the beta coefficient obtained from the submodels computed during the model cross-validation (Rinnan et al 2015). The cross validation was performed with 200 segments by removing seven rows (one consumer) at a time, as previously suggested for this type of data structure (Reinbach et al 2014;Rinnan et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%