2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08219-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Checkpointing in Failure Recovery in Computing and Data Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that the distribution of L b has finite support on [0, b], given by (2). First, we prove the following general upper bound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that the distribution of L b has finite support on [0, b], given by (2). First, we prove the following general upper bound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was first recognized in [6] that this model results in power law distributions when the distributions of L ≡ L ∞ and A have a matrix exponential representation, and this result was rigorously proved and further generalized in [3], [11], and [16]. A related study when L = is a constant and failure/arrival rates are time-dependent Poisson distributions can be found in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The sybil attack resistant network centralities based on the hitting times of a random walk with restart have been proposed in [14,18]. Markov processes with restart are useful for the analysis of replace and restart types protocols in computer reliability, [2], [3], [17]. The restart policy is also used to speedup the Las Vegas type randomized algorithms [1], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%