2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chelatable trace zinc causes low, irreproducible KDAC8 activity

Abstract: Acetylation is an important regulatory mechanism in cells, and emphasis is being placed on identifying substrates and small molecule modulators of this post-translational modification. However, the reported in vitro activity of the lysine deacetylase KDAC8 is inconsistent across experimental setups, even with the same substrate, complicating progress in the field. We detected trace levels of zinc, a known inhibitor of KDAC8 when present in excess, even in high-quality buffer reagents, at concentrations that ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were primarily interested in KDAC8 (class I) and KDAC6 (class II). Both are relatively well-characterized KDACs with respect to crystal structures and previous screening work, and both have several putative substrates identified from in vitro and/or cell-based experiments. ,,,, , We used KDAC1 for comparison as it is also a moderately well-characterized class I KDAC; however, it is primarily thought to reside in the nucleus and deacetylate histone proteins. ,, We used the FRK ac RW peptide as a starting point. This peptide was derived from an acetylated human protein (ADAP1; UniProtKB O75689), and we previously identified it as an in vitro substrate for KDAC1, KDAC6, and KDAC8. , Using a fluorescamine-based in vitro assay, we tested the activity of the KDACs with a set of peptides derived from FRK ac RW, where we replaced each of the residues following the acetyllysine (the +1 and +2 positions) with alanine and/or swapped their order to determine whether these residues influenced the activities of KDAC1, KDAC6, and KDAC8 with the peptide substrates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were primarily interested in KDAC8 (class I) and KDAC6 (class II). Both are relatively well-characterized KDACs with respect to crystal structures and previous screening work, and both have several putative substrates identified from in vitro and/or cell-based experiments. ,,,, , We used KDAC1 for comparison as it is also a moderately well-characterized class I KDAC; however, it is primarily thought to reside in the nucleus and deacetylate histone proteins. ,, We used the FRK ac RW peptide as a starting point. This peptide was derived from an acetylated human protein (ADAP1; UniProtKB O75689), and we previously identified it as an in vitro substrate for KDAC1, KDAC6, and KDAC8. , Using a fluorescamine-based in vitro assay, we tested the activity of the KDACs with a set of peptides derived from FRK ac RW, where we replaced each of the residues following the acetyllysine (the +1 and +2 positions) with alanine and/or swapped their order to determine whether these residues influenced the activities of KDAC1, KDAC6, and KDAC8 with the peptide substrates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, a direct enzyme‐substrate relationship would be determined by presenting purified enzyme with a purified, recombinant substrate; however, the logistical challenges involved in obtaining an adequate quantity of recombinant substrate protein that is site‐specifically acetylated render this approach not broadly feasible. Additionally, experimental conditions have been shown to have significant effects on KDAC activity in vitro; 14,102,103 thus, it is difficult to determine how well the in vitro conditions mimic the cellular environment and how the behavior of the enzyme in vitro relates to its cellular behavior. Therefore, experiments of both types (cell‐based and in vitro) identifying the same enzyme‐substrate pair are necessary to show direct, biologically relevant deacetylation of a target protein.…”
Section: Approaches For Kdac Substrate Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%