2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
328
6
21

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
328
6
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of dicalcium silicate hydration is slower than that of tricalcium silicate in the composition of calcium silicate cements. Therefore, later dicalcium silicate hydration may improve the cement strength in the presence of humidity 31) . This can consequently lead to more CSH formation and higher strength acquisition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of dicalcium silicate hydration is slower than that of tricalcium silicate in the composition of calcium silicate cements. Therefore, later dicalcium silicate hydration may improve the cement strength in the presence of humidity 31) . This can consequently lead to more CSH formation and higher strength acquisition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, various in vivo studies that assessed the biocompatibility of this cement (21,22) demonstrated that after 30 days, the material allowed adequate tissue repair, indicating that the alkaline pH produced by calcium ion release was maintained (22,23). It is believed that this ability to maintain the alkaline pH of the medium is the main responsible for the excellent biological performances of MTA and EndoBinder (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a number of studies have suggested the use of PC as a less expensive alternate of MTA in dental practices 12,17,18) . However, in contrast, several researchers disagree with the idea of using PC in dental applications and have reported differences between MTA and PC in terms of chemical composition, surface chemical characteristics, compressive strength, cation release and particle sizes 2,15,[19][20][21] . As the potential of PC in providing an inexpensive solution to economic drawbacks of MTA is eclipsed by the controversy existing between the reported studies, there is a need to further probe in to the characterization and comparison of MTA and PC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%