2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical bath deposition of PbS nanocrystals: Effect of substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deposited films using lead acetate (at the same PH) (18), shows much lower deposition rate comparing to the lead nitrite. Nucleation stage in the present work (of film deposited on glass substrate) is greater than those obtained with Si substrate using lead nitrite (17), this could be attributed to the high concentration of the reactive centers in the glass substrate since the CBD process can be controlled by the number active sites in the substrate surface [22].…”
Section: Volume 34contrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deposited films using lead acetate (at the same PH) (18), shows much lower deposition rate comparing to the lead nitrite. Nucleation stage in the present work (of film deposited on glass substrate) is greater than those obtained with Si substrate using lead nitrite (17), this could be attributed to the high concentration of the reactive centers in the glass substrate since the CBD process can be controlled by the number active sites in the substrate surface [22].…”
Section: Volume 34contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…They even offer an opportunity for a 'do-ityourself' approach to the production of device and coating [16]. Nanocrystalline PbS layers have been deposited chemically on different substrates (17,18). We have investigated here the role of deposition parameters in the most common method of synthesis PbS nanocrystals deposited on glass substrate …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E g for doped samples in the 2.4-3.8 eV range the large experimentally observed E g in the nanoparticle films theoretically estimated (using Vegar ds law) E g for bulk shows the extent of quantum size effect in the nanoparticle films. The fundamental optical transition of doped films (E g = 0.41 eV) is not observed in these films, presumably because of complete mixing of PbS with Ni 2+ affording a unique ternary intermetallic compound of the Pb x Ni 1−x S type [1]. It is observed that the size effect on the optical bandgap is stronger in nanoparticle films than in PbS nanoparticle of 24-10 nm (average crystallite size) and shows an E g : 2.22-2.65 eV [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The interest into deposition of ternary derivative materials, the potential of designing and tailoring both the lattice parameters and the forbidden bandgap energy (E g ) by controlling growth parameters [1,2] has grown. In this regard, many techniques have been successfully employed: successive ionic layer and reaction (SILAR) [3], sol gel methods [4], and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band gap of PbS can be easily adjusted 44 up to a few electron volts when the size of the particles is reduced. 45 Such a significant widening of the band gap is associated with small 46 effective masses of electrons and holes (m e = m h = 0.09m 0 ) as well 47 as with a large exciton Bohr radius (20 nm) of PbS [1]. Nanomateri-48 als of PbS have been discovered to have exceptional third-order 49 nonlinear optical property with potential applications in optical 50 devices such as optical switches [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%