2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical characterization of floral scents in the six endemic baobab species (Adansonia sp.) of Madagascar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be related to other studies that highlight a distinction between sections. Thus, this distinction established on the basis of botanical and molecular characteristics, was also verified by comparing the chemical composition of the fragrances of the baobab flowers: the species belonging to the Longitubae section emit a large quantity of compounds with aromatic structures, dominated by 2‐phenylacetonitrile, whereas the fragrances of the two species of Brevitubae are rich in compounds with aliphatic structures, particularly 8‐heptadecene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This result may be related to other studies that highlight a distinction between sections. Thus, this distinction established on the basis of botanical and molecular characteristics, was also verified by comparing the chemical composition of the fragrances of the baobab flowers: the species belonging to the Longitubae section emit a large quantity of compounds with aromatic structures, dominated by 2‐phenylacetonitrile, whereas the fragrances of the two species of Brevitubae are rich in compounds with aliphatic structures, particularly 8‐heptadecene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Methoxybenzaldehyde, eluted in peak 60 with a molecular ion at m / z 137.0600 [M + H] + , C 8 H 8 O 2 and fragment ion at m / z 122 and 109 for the consecutive cleavage of CH 3 and CO. 32 Similarly, peaks 61 & 62 with [M − H] + at m / z 133.0651, C 9 H 8 O, & 165.0907, C 10 H 12 O 2 and fragments at m / z 105 & 137 accounting for the loss of CO and were ascribed as cinnamaldehyde 33 and eugenol, 32 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%