2011
DOI: 10.5513/jcea01/12.2.915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical composition and quality of sweet sorghum and maize silages

Abstract: Sweet sorghum (Sorghum saccharatum) silage, maize (Zea mays) silage, and sorghum and maize (1:1) silage were investigated. The silages were analysed for chemical composition, quality and aerobic stability. Dry matter was the lowest (20.88%) in sorghum silage and the highest (37.45%) in maize silage. In sorghum silage, the concentration of crude ash and crude fibre was higher, and that of crude protein, crude fat and N-free extractives lower compared to maize silage. Neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The LA content in silage of our study was within this recommended range, an indication of well-fermented silage. However, the LA concentration recorded in our study was lower than 160 g LA/kg DM reported in sweet sorghum silage (Xing et al, 2009) but consistent with that reported by Podkowka & Podkowka (2011). It has been reported that homofermentative LAB or LAB+enzyme inoculation has positive effects on the silage fermentation by increasing LA compared with the control (Kung et al, 1991, Chen et al, 1994.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 32%
“…The LA content in silage of our study was within this recommended range, an indication of well-fermented silage. However, the LA concentration recorded in our study was lower than 160 g LA/kg DM reported in sweet sorghum silage (Xing et al, 2009) but consistent with that reported by Podkowka & Podkowka (2011). It has been reported that homofermentative LAB or LAB+enzyme inoculation has positive effects on the silage fermentation by increasing LA compared with the control (Kung et al, 1991, Chen et al, 1994.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 32%
“…Saccharine varieties have a succulent stem and, as a result, showed high effluent production (Podkówka & Podkówka, 2011) França et al (2011) using forage varieties. This excessive effluent can promote the development of anaerobic bacteria of the genus Clostridium, which produce butyric acid, resulting in the degradation of protein and lactic acid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All varieties presented satisfactory performance (Coan et al, 2007;Podkówka & Podkówka, 2011;Dias et al, 2014) in the studied parameters, except effluent production, which must be reduced to ensure a more appropriate use of nutrients from the silage produced from the saccharine varieties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008; Podkówka and Podkówka, 2011), mainly due to its high green yield that is less dependent on environmental conditions as compared with other feeds, e.g., maize, the most popular forage in feeding rations for dairy and beef cattle (Oliver et al, 2004;Staggenborg et al, 2008). Sorghum contains less protein and energy than maize, however (Oliver et al, 2004;Staggenborg et al, 2008;Podkówka and Podkówka, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorghum contains less protein and energy than maize, however (Oliver et al, 2004;Staggenborg et al, 2008;Podkówka and Podkówka, 2011). Ensiling of whole-crop sorghum in combination with other feeds was recently proposed as a method of increasing the nutritive value of sorghum silage for ruminants (Pyś et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%