2014
DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v44i2.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical composition of hulled, dehulled and naked oat grains

Abstract: The objective of the work was to evaluate the influence of genetic and mechanical removal of hulls from oat grains on their nutrient content. The studies included three cultivars and six lines of oat grains. In grain samples of hulled (5 samples), dehulled (5 samples) and naked (4 samples) oats, the following components were determined: chemical composition (ash, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre and its components) and amino acids and fatty acid composition. The grain of naked and dehulled oats contained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
33
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative and high magnitude (below -0.50) correlations were observed between contents of NSC and those of PROT, TF and IF. These negative correlations have been previously reported (Biel et al, 2014;Crestani et al, 2012;Peterson et al, 2005). In addition, the amylose content, a starch component, presented negative correlation with the PROT content (Hang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Negative and high magnitude (below -0.50) correlations were observed between contents of NSC and those of PROT, TF and IF. These negative correlations have been previously reported (Biel et al, 2014;Crestani et al, 2012;Peterson et al, 2005). In addition, the amylose content, a starch component, presented negative correlation with the PROT content (Hang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In a previous study on oat cultivars and lines from breeding programs in the United States, Canada and the Netherlands, an average equal to 16.5 g 100 g −1 (Peterson et al, 2005) was found. A lower PROT content (13.7 g 100 g −1 ) was observed for genotypes in Poland (Biel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations