2009
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.820.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Control of Post-Harvest Diseases of Mango: The Effect of Fludioxonil and Prochloraz on Soft Brown Rot, Stem-End Rot and Anthracnose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that fludioxonil is more effective than prochloraz in controlling SER caused by Lasiodiplodia in Pinkerton avocado fruits. This observation is in agreement with the results reported in recent studies, demonstrating fludioxonil superiority over prochloraz in controlling SER caused by Lasiodiplodia in mango fruit [13,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Effect Of Postharvest Application Of Fungicides On Ser Causesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results indicate that fludioxonil is more effective than prochloraz in controlling SER caused by Lasiodiplodia in Pinkerton avocado fruits. This observation is in agreement with the results reported in recent studies, demonstrating fludioxonil superiority over prochloraz in controlling SER caused by Lasiodiplodia in mango fruit [13,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Effect Of Postharvest Application Of Fungicides On Ser Causesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sportak (prochloraz, research sample only; Bayer Crop Science, Raleigh, NC) in preliminary in vitro studies and 1 year of field data (data not shown) was by far the best effective fungicide against C. gloeosporioides. It is widely used for managing postharvest disease on mango (Coates et al 1993;Swart et al 2009) and avocado (McMillan and Narayanan 1991). This product is not available for commercial use in the United States but could be an important component of an IPM program where it is registered, especially when combined with emerging sources of host resistance (Mangandi et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungal pathogens of mango such as C. gloeosporioides and Lasiodiplodia theobromae are of major concern to the industry (Swart et al, 2002). Currently, pack houses use combinations of hot-water treatments and synthetic fungicide dips (Johnson et al, 1995) or modifiedatmosphere packaging (MAP) (Kim et al, 2007) to prevent decay and extend shelf life.…”
Section: Mangomentioning
confidence: 99%